Xeon E5502 vs Celeron J1900

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron J1900
2013, $82
4 cores / 4 threads, 10 Watt
0.66
+37.5%

Celeron J1900 outperforms Xeon E5502 by a substantial 38% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking30223203
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesIntel Celeronno data
Power efficiency2.780.25
DesignerIntelIntel
Manufacturerno dataIntel
Architecture codenameBay Trail-D (2013)Gainestown (2009−2010)
Release date1 November 2013 (12 years ago)30 March 2009 (17 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$82$95

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

Celeron J1900 and Xeon E5502 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speed2 GHz1.86 GHz
Boost clock speed2.42 GHz1.87 GHz
L1 cache224 KB64 KB (per core)
L2 cache2 MB256 KB (per core)
L3 cache2 MB L2 Cache4 MB (shared)
Chip lithography22 nm45 nm
Die sizeno data263 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °C76 °C
Number of transistorsno data731 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Celeron J1900 and Xeon E5502 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
SocketFCBGA1170FCLGA1366,PLGA1366
Power consumption (TDP)10 Watt80 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron J1900 and Xeon E5502. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology--
Idle Statesno data+
Demand Based Switchingno data+
PAE36 Bit40 Bit
FDI-no data
RST-no data

Security technologies

Celeron J1900 and Xeon E5502 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDB++
Anti-Theft-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron J1900 and Xeon E5502 are enumerated here.

VT-d-+
VT-x++
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron J1900 and Xeon E5502. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3
Maximum memory size8 GB144 GB
Max memory channels23
Maximum memory bandwidthno data19.2 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics for Intel Atom Processor Z3700 SeriesN/A
Quick Sync Video+-
Graphics max frequency854 MHzno data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron J1900 and Xeon E5502 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported2no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron J1900 and Xeon E5502.

PCIe version2.02.0
PCI Express lanes4no data

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Celeron J1900 0.66
+37.5%
Xeon E5502 0.48

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Celeron J1900 1150
+37.4%
Samples: 846
Xeon E5502 837
Samples: 8

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.66 0.48
Recency 1 November 2013 30 March 2009
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 4 2
Chip lithography 22 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 80 Watt

Celeron J1900 has a 38% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, a 105% more advanced lithography process, and 700% lower power consumption.

The Intel Celeron J1900 is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Xeon E5502 in performance tests.

Be aware that Celeron J1900 is a notebook processor while Xeon E5502 is a server/workstation one.

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 228 votes

Rate Celeron J1900 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon E5502 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Celeron J1900 and Xeon E5502, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.