N200 vs Celeron J1750

Primary details

Comparing Celeron J1750 and N200 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking	not rated	1503
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Series	Intel Celeron	no data
Architecture codename	Bay Trail-D (2013)	no data
Release date	1 September 2013 (10 years ago)	1 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$72	no data
Current price	$200 (2.8x MSRP)	no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron J1750 and N200 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores	2 (Dual-core)	no data
Threads	2	4
Base clock speed	2.41 GHz	no data
Boost clock speed	2.41 GHz	3.7 GHz
L1 cache	112 KB	no data
L2 cache	1 MB	no data
L3 cache	1 MB L2 Cache	6 MB Intel® Smart Cache
Chip lithography	22 nm	Intel 7 nm
Maximum core temperature	100 °C	105 °C
64 bit support	+	+
Windows 11 compatibility	-	no data
Unlocked multiplier	No	No

Compatibility

Information on Celeron J1750 and N200 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration	1	1
Socket	FCBGA1170	FCBGA1264
Power consumption (TDP)	10 Watt	6 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron J1750 and N200. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions	no data	Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI	-	+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)	+	+
Speed Shift	no data	+
Turbo Boost Technology	-	no data
Hyper-Threading Technology	-	-
Thermal Monitoring	no data	+
SIPP	-	no data
PAE	36 Bit	no data
GPIO	no data	+
FDI	-	no data
Status	Discontinued	Launched
RST	-	no data

Security technologies

Celeron J1750 and N200 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDB	+	no data
Identity Protection	-	no data
OS Guard	no data	+
Anti-Theft	-	no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron J1750 and N200 are enumerated here.

VT-d	-	+
VT-x	+	+
EPT	no data	+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron J1750 and N200. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory types	DDR3	DDR4-3200, DDR5-4800, LPDDR5-4800
Maximum memory size	8 GB	16 GB
Max memory channels	2	1
ECC memory support	-	-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card	Intel® HD Graphics for Intel Atom® Processor Z3700 Series	Intel UHD Graphics
Quick Sync Video	-	+
Graphics max frequency	750 MHz	750 MHz
Execution Units	no data	32

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron J1750 and N200 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported

2

3

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Celeron J1750 and N200 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution support	no data	+
Max resolution over HDMI 1.4	no data	4096 x 2160@60Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPort	no data	4096 x 2160@60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron J1750 and N200 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX	no data	12.1
OpenGL	no data	4.6

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron J1750 and N200.

PCIe version	2.0	no data
PCI Express lanes	4	9
USB revision	no data	2.0/3.2

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

---

Pros & cons summary

---

Recency	1 September 2013	1 January 2023
Threads	2	4
Power consumption (TDP)	10 Watt	6 Watt

---

Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron J1750 and N200, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.

---