EPYC 9965 vs Celeron J1750

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Celeron J1750 and EPYC 9965 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking3076not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesIntel Celeronno data
Power efficiency3.22no data
Architecture codenameBay Trail-D (2013)Turin (2024)
Release date1 September 2013 (11 years ago)10 October 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$72$14,813

Detailed specifications

Celeron J1750 and EPYC 9965 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)192
Threads2384
Base clock speed2.41 GHz2.25 GHz
Boost clock speed2.41 GHz3.7 GHz
L1 cache112 KB80 KB (per core)
L2 cache1 MB1 MB (per core)
L3 cache1 MB L2 Cache384 MB (shared)
Chip lithography22 nm3 nm
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron J1750 and EPYC 9965 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
SocketFCBGA1170SP5
Power consumption (TDP)10 Watt500 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron J1750 and EPYC 9965. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
PAE36 Bitno data
FDI-no data
RST-no data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Celeron J1750 and EPYC 9965 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDB+no data
Anti-Theft-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron J1750 and EPYC 9965 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d-no data
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron J1750 and EPYC 9965. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR5
Maximum memory size8 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics for Intel Atom Processor Z3700 SeriesN/A
Graphics max frequency750 MHzno data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron J1750 and EPYC 9965 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported2no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron J1750 and EPYC 9965.

PCIe version2.05.0
PCI Express lanes4128

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 September 2013 10 October 2024
Physical cores 2 192
Threads 2 384
Chip lithography 22 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 500 Watt

Celeron J1750 has 4900% lower power consumption.

EPYC 9965, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 11 years, 9500% more physical cores and 19100% more threads, and a 633.3% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Celeron J1750 and EPYC 9965. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Celeron J1750 is a notebook processor while EPYC 9965 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron J1750 and EPYC 9965, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron J1750
Celeron J1750
AMD EPYC 9965
EPYC 9965

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2 4 votes

Rate Celeron J1750 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 30 votes

Rate EPYC 9965 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron J1750 or EPYC 9965, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.