Ultra 5 226V vs Celeron J1750

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Celeron J1750 and Core Ultra 5 226V processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated649
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Celeronno data
Power efficiencyno data65.86
Architecture codenameBay Trail-D (2013)Lunar Lake (2024)
Release date1 September 2013 (11 years ago)24 September 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$72no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron J1750 and Core Ultra 5 226V basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads28
Base clock speed2.41 GHz2.1 GHz
Boost clock speed2.41 GHz4.5 GHz
Bus rateno data37 MHz
L1 cache112 KB192 KB (per core)
L2 cache1 MB2.5 MB (per core)
L3 cache1 MB L2 Cache8 MB (shared)
Chip lithography22 nm3 nm
Maximum core temperature100 °C100 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron J1750 and Core Ultra 5 226V compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCBGA1170Intel BGA 2833
Power consumption (TDP)10 Watt17 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron J1750 and Core Ultra 5 226V. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
TSX-+
PAE36 Bitno data
FDI-no data
RST-no data

Security technologies

Celeron J1750 and Core Ultra 5 226V technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDB+no data
Anti-Theft-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron J1750 and Core Ultra 5 226V are enumerated here.

VT-d-+
VT-x++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron J1750 and Core Ultra 5 226V. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR5
Maximum memory size8 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® HD Graphics for Intel Atom® Processor Z3700 SeriesArc 130V
Graphics max frequency750 MHzno data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron J1750 and Core Ultra 5 226V integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported2no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron J1750 and Core Ultra 5 226V.

PCIe version2.05.0
PCI Express lanes44

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron J1750 595
Ultra 5 226V 18795
+3059%

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 September 2013 24 September 2024
Physical cores 2 8
Threads 2 8
Chip lithography 22 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 17 Watt

Celeron J1750 has 70% lower power consumption.

Ultra 5 226V, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 11 years, 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 633.3% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Celeron J1750 and Core Ultra 5 226V. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron J1750 and Core Ultra 5 226V, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron J1750
Celeron J1750
Intel Core Ultra 5 226V
Core Ultra 5 226V

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2 4 votes

Rate Celeron J1750 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Core Ultra 5 226V on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron J1750 or Core Ultra 5 226V, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.