Xeon 6325P vs Celeron G6900E

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron G6900E
2022
2 cores / 2 threads, 46 Watt
2.66
Xeon 6325P
2025
4 cores / 8 threads, 55 Watt
9.96
+274%

Xeon 6325P outperforms Celeron G6900E by a whopping 274% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1857878
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data76.54
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Power efficiency5.5817.47
DesignerIntelIntel
ManufacturerIntelIntel
Architecture codenameAlder Lake-S (2022)Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025)
Release date4 January 2022 (3 years ago)24 February 2025 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$281

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

Celeron G6900E and Xeon 6325P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads28
Base clock speed3 GHz3.5 GHz
Boost clock speed3 GHz5.2 GHz
L1 cache80K (per core)80 KB (per core)
L2 cache1.25 MB (per core)1.25 MB (per core)
L3 cache4 MB (shared)12 MB (shared)
Chip lithography10 nm10 nm
Die sizeno data163 mm2
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron G6900E and Xeon 6325P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
Socket17001700
Power consumption (TDP)46 Watt55 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron G6900E and Xeon 6325P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
TSX+-

Security technologies

Celeron G6900E and Xeon 6325P technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron G6900E and Xeon 6325P are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron G6900E and Xeon 6325P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4, DDR5 Dual-channelDDR4, DDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel UHD Graphics 710N/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron G6900E and Xeon 6325P.

PCIe version5.05.0
PCI Express lanesno data16

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Celeron G6900E 2.66
Xeon 6325P 9.96
+274%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Celeron G6900E 4272
Xeon 6325P 16013
+275%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.66 9.96
Recency 4 January 2022 24 February 2025
Physical cores 2 4
Threads 2 8
Power consumption (TDP) 46 Watt 55 Watt

Celeron G6900E has 19.6% lower power consumption.

Xeon 6325P, on the other hand, has a 274.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, and 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads.

The Intel Xeon 6325P is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Celeron G6900E in performance tests.

Note that Celeron G6900E is a desktop processor while Xeon 6325P is a server/workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron G6900E
Celeron G6900E
Intel Xeon 6325P
Xeon 6325P

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.4 7 votes

Rate Celeron G6900E on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon 6325P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Celeron G6900E and Xeon 6325P, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.