Processor N100 vs Celeron G6900E
Primary details
Comparing Celeron G6900E and Processor N100 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | not rated | 1570 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | 88 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
| Series | no data | Intel Alder Lake-N |
| Architecture codename | Alder Lake-S (2022) | Alder Lake-N (2023) |
| Release date | 4 January 2022 (2 years ago) | 3 January 2023 (1 year ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $128 |
Detailed specifications
Celeron G6900E and Processor N100 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 2 | 4 |
| Base clock speed | 3 GHz | 0.1 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3 GHz | 3.4 GHz |
| L1 cache | 80K (per core) | 96 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 1.25 MB (per core) | 2 MB (shared) |
| L3 cache | 4 MB (shared) | 6 MB |
| Chip lithography | 10 nm | 10 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 105 °C |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | + | + |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron G6900E and Processor N100 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | 1700 | BGA1264 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 46 Watt | 6 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron G6900E and Processor N100. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| FMA | - | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
| TSX | + | - |
Security technologies
Celeron G6900E and Processor N100 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron G6900E and Processor N100 are enumerated here.
| VT-d | + | + |
| VT-x | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron G6900E and Processor N100. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4, DDR5 Dual-channel | DDR4, DDR5 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card Compare | Intel UHD Graphics 710 | Intel UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron G6900E and Processor N100.
| PCIe version | 5.0 | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 9 |
Pros & cons summary
| Integrated graphics card | 2.85 | 2.32 |
| Recency | 4 January 2022 | 3 January 2023 |
| Physical cores | 2 | 4 |
| Threads | 2 | 4 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 46 Watt | 6 Watt |
Celeron G6900E has 22.8% faster integrated GPU.
Processor N100, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 11 months, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and 666.7% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Celeron G6900E and Processor N100. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that Celeron G6900E is a desktop processor while Processor N100 is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron G6900E and Processor N100, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
