Core i9-13900K vs Celeron G6900

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron G6900
2022
2 cores / 2 threads, 46 Watt
2.94
Core i9-13900K
2022
24 cores / 32 threads, 125 Watt
38.32
+1203%

i9-13900K outperforms Celeron G6900 by a whopping 1203% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron G6900 and Core i9-13900K processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking157572
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation16.5376.89
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Seriesno dataIntel Core i9
Architecture codenameAlder Lake-S (2022)Raptor Lake-S
Release date4 January 2022 (2 years ago)27 September 2022 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$589
Current price$89 $553 (0.9x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

i9-13900K has 365% better value for money than Celeron G6900.

Detailed specifications

Celeron G6900 and Core i9-13900K basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)24 (Tetracosa-Core)
Threads232
Base clock speed3.4 GHz3 GHz
Boost clock speed3.4 GHz5.7 GHz
L1 cache80K (per core)80K (per core)
L2 cache1.25 MB (per core)2 MB (per core)
L3 cache4 MB (shared)36 MB (shared)
Chip lithographyIntel 7 nmIntel 7 nm
Die sizeno data257 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °C100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data72 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplierNoYes

Compatibility

Information on Celeron G6900 and Core i9-13900K compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA1700FCLGA1700
Power consumption (TDP)46 Watt125 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron G6900 and Core i9-13900K. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
AVX++
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift++
Turbo Boost Technology-2.0
Hyper-Threading Technology-+
TSX+no data
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
SIPPno data+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-+
StatusLaunchedLaunched

Security technologies

Celeron G6900 and Core i9-13900K technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
Secure Key++
OS Guard++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron G6900 and Core i9-13900K are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron G6900 and Core i9-13900K. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5-4800, DDR4-3200DDR4, DDR5
Maximum memory size128 GB192 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth76.8 GB/s89.6 GB/s
ECC memory supportno data+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel UHD Graphics 710Intel UHD Graphics 770
Quick Sync Video++
Clear Video HD++
Graphics max frequency1.3 GHz1.65 GHz
Execution Units1632

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron G6900 and Core i9-13900K integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported44

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Celeron G6900 and Core i9-13900K integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096 x 2160 @ 60Hz4096 x 2160 @ 60Hz
Max resolution over eDP5120 x 3200 @ 120Hz5120 x 3200 @ 120Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPort7680 x 4320 @ 60Hz7680 x 4320 @ 60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron G6900 and Core i9-13900K integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX1212
OpenGL4.54.5

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron G6900 and Core i9-13900K.

PCIe version5.0 and 4.05.0 and 4.0
PCI Express lanes2020

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron G6900 2.94
i9-13900K 38.32
+1203%

Core i9-13900K outperforms Celeron G6900 by 1203% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Celeron G6900 4550
i9-13900K 59276
+1203%

Core i9-13900K outperforms Celeron G6900 by 1203% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Celeron G6900 1647
i9-13900K 2982
+81.1%

Core i9-13900K outperforms Celeron G6900 by 81% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Celeron G6900 2760
i9-13900K 20186
+631%

Core i9-13900K outperforms Celeron G6900 by 631% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.94 38.32
Recency 4 January 2022 27 September 2022
Physical cores 2 24
Threads 2 32
Power consumption (TDP) 46 Watt 125 Watt

The Core i9-13900K is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron G6900 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron G6900 and Core i9-13900K, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron G6900
Celeron G6900
Intel Core i9-13900K
Core i9-13900K

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 158 votes

Rate Celeron G6900 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 1787 votes

Rate Core i9-13900K on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron G6900 or Core i9-13900K, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.