Ryzen 7 3700U vs Celeron G550

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron G550
2012
2 cores / 2 threads, 65 Watt
0.81
Ryzen 7 3700U
2019
4 cores / 8 threads, 15 Watt
4.63
+472%

Ryzen 7 3700U outperforms Celeron G550 by a whopping 472% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron G550 and Ryzen 7 3700U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking25021225
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.65no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataAMD Ryzen 7
Architecture codenameSandy Bridge (2011−2013)Picasso-U (Zen+)
Release date1 June 2012 (12 years ago)6 January 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$80no data
Current price$96 (1.2x MSRP)$625

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron G550 and Ryzen 7 3700U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads28
Base clock speed2.6 GHz2.3 GHz
Boost clock speed2.6 GHz4 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)384 KB
L2 cache256 KB (per core)2 MB
L3 cache2 MB (shared)4 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm12 nm
Die size131 mm2209.78 mm2
Maximum core temperature69 °C105 °C
Number of transistors504 million4940 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Celeron G550 and Ryzen 7 3700U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCLGA1155FP5
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron G550 and Ryzen 7 3700U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2DDR4-2400, PCIe 3, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
AES-NI-+
FMAno data+
AVXno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+no data
Flex Memory Access+no data
FDI+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data
StatusDiscontinuedno data

Security technologies

Celeron G550 and Ryzen 7 3700U technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron G550 and Ryzen 7 3700U are enumerated here.

AMD-Vno data+
VT-d-no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron G550 and Ryzen 7 3700U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4
Maximum memory size32 GB64 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth17 GB/s38.397 GB/s
ECC memory supportno data+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® HD Graphics for 2nd Generation Intel® ProcessorsAMD Radeon RX Vega 10
Graphics max frequency1 GHzno data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron G550 and Ryzen 7 3700U integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported2no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron G550 and Ryzen 7 3700U.

PCIe version2.03.0
PCI Express lanesno data12

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron G550 0.81
Ryzen 7 3700U 4.63
+472%

Ryzen 7 3700U outperforms Celeron G550 by 472% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Celeron G550 1255
Ryzen 7 3700U 7165
+471%

Ryzen 7 3700U outperforms Celeron G550 by 471% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Celeron G550 385
Ryzen 7 3700U 882
+129%

Ryzen 7 3700U outperforms Celeron G550 by 129% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Celeron G550 629
Ryzen 7 3700U 2543
+304%

Ryzen 7 3700U outperforms Celeron G550 by 304% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.81 4.63
Recency 1 June 2012 6 January 2019
Physical cores 2 4
Threads 2 8
Chip lithography 32 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 15 Watt

The Ryzen 7 3700U is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron G550 in performance tests.

Note that Celeron G550 is a desktop processor while Ryzen 7 3700U is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron G550 and Ryzen 7 3700U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron G550
Celeron G550
AMD Ryzen 7 3700U
Ryzen 7 3700U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3 81 vote

Rate Celeron G550 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 1379 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 3700U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron G550 or Ryzen 7 3700U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.