EPYC Embedded 3201 vs Celeron G550

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2948not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.65no data
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Seriesno dataAMD EPYC Embedded
Power efficiency0.47no data
DesignerIntelAMD
ManufacturerIntelGlobalFoundries
Architecture codenameSandy Bridge (2011−2013)Zen (2017−2020)
Release date1 June 2012 (13 years ago)21 February 2018 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$80no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

Celeron G550 and EPYC Embedded 3201 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads28
Base clock speed2.6 GHz1.5 GHz
Boost clock speed2.6 GHz3.1 GHz
Bus rate5 GT/sno data
Multiplierno data15
L1 cache64 KB (per core)96K (per core)
L2 cache256 KB (per core)512K (per core)
L3 cache2 MB (shared)16 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm14 nm
Die size131 mm2213 mm2
Maximum core temperature69 °Cno data
Number of transistors504 million4,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Celeron G550 and EPYC Embedded 3201 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCLGA1155AMD BGA SP4r2
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt30 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron G550 and EPYC Embedded 3201. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2no data
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access+no data
FDI+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data

Security technologies

Celeron G550 and EPYC Embedded 3201 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron G550 and EPYC Embedded 3201 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d-no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron G550 and EPYC Embedded 3201. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4-2133
Maximum memory size32 GB512 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth17 GB/s34.13 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics for 2nd Generation Intel Processorsno data
Graphics max frequency1 GHzno data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron G550 and EPYC Embedded 3201 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported2no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron G550 and EPYC Embedded 3201.

PCIe version2.03.0
PCI Express lanesno data32

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 June 2012 21 February 2018
Physical cores 2 8
Threads 2 8
Chip lithography 32 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 30 Watt

EPYC Embedded 3201 has an age advantage of 5 years, 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads, a 129% more advanced lithography process, and 117% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Intel Celeron G550 and AMD EPYC Embedded 3201. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that Celeron G550 is a desktop processor while EPYC Embedded 3201 is a server/workstation one.

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3 107 votes

Rate Celeron G550 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 1 vote

Rate EPYC Embedded 3201 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Celeron G550 and EPYC Embedded 3201, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.