EPYC 9475F vs Celeron G4950
Primary details
Comparing Celeron G4950 and EPYC 9475F processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 2054 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 5.37 | no data |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Server |
| Series | Intel Celeron | no data |
| Power efficiency | 3.00 | no data |
| Architecture codename | Coffee Lake (2017−2019) | Turin (2024) |
| Release date | 23 April 2019 (5 years ago) | 10 October 2024 (less than a year ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $52 | $7,592 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Celeron G4950 and EPYC 9475F basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 48 (Octatetraconta-Core) |
| Threads | 2 | 96 |
| Base clock speed | 3.3 GHz | 3.65 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.3 GHz | 4.8 GHz |
| Bus type | DMI 3.0 | no data |
| Bus rate | 4 × 8 GT/s | no data |
| L1 cache | 128 KB | 80 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 512 KB | 1 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 2 MB | 256 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 4 nm |
| Die size | 126 mm2 | 8x 70.6 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | no data | 66,520 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | + | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron G4950 and EPYC 9475F compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | 2 |
| Socket | FCLGA1151 | SP5 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 54 Watt | 400 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron G4950 and EPYC 9475F. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2 | no data |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
| Turbo Boost Technology | - | no data |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | - | no data |
| Idle States | + | no data |
| Thermal Monitoring | + | - |
| Precision Boost 2 | no data | + |
Security technologies
Celeron G4950 and EPYC 9475F technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | - | no data |
| EDB | + | no data |
| Secure Key | + | no data |
| MPX | + | - |
| Identity Protection | + | - |
| SGX | Yes with Intel® ME | no data |
| OS Guard | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron G4950 and EPYC 9475F are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
| VT-d | + | no data |
| VT-x | + | no data |
| EPT | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron G4950 and EPYC 9475F. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4-2400 | DDR5 |
| Maximum memory size | 64 GB | no data |
| Max memory channels | 2 | no data |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 38.397 GB/s | no data |
| ECC memory support | + | - |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Intel UHD Graphics 610 | N/A |
| Max video memory | 64 GB | no data |
| Quick Sync Video | + | - |
| Clear Video | + | no data |
| Clear Video HD | + | no data |
| Graphics max frequency | 1.05 GHz | no data |
| InTru 3D | + | no data |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of Celeron G4950 and EPYC 9475F integrated GPUs.
| Number of displays supported | 3 | no data |
Graphics image quality
Maximum display resolutions supported by Celeron G4950 and EPYC 9475F integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.
| 4K resolution support | + | no data |
| Max resolution over HDMI 1.4 | 4096x2304@24Hz | no data |
| Max resolution over eDP | 4096x2304@60Hz | no data |
| Max resolution over DisplayPort | 4096x2304@60Hz | no data |
Graphics API support
APIs supported by Celeron G4950 and EPYC 9475F integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.
| DirectX | 12 | no data |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron G4950 and EPYC 9475F.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | 5.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 16 | 128 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 23 April 2019 | 10 October 2024 |
| Physical cores | 2 | 48 |
| Threads | 2 | 96 |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 4 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 54 Watt | 400 Watt |
Celeron G4950 has 640.7% lower power consumption.
EPYC 9475F, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 5 years, 2300% more physical cores and 4700% more threads, and a 250% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Celeron G4950 and EPYC 9475F. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that Celeron G4950 is a desktop processor while EPYC 9475F is a server/workstation one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron G4950 and EPYC 9475F, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
