Processor N100 vs Celeron G4930

VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron G4930
2019
2 cores / 2 threads, 54 Watt
1.63
Processor N100
2023
4 cores / 4 threads, 6 Watt
2.35
+44.2%

Processor N100 outperforms Celeron G4930 by a considerable 44% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron G4930 and Processor N100 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking20761788
Place by popularitynot in top-10065
Cost-effectiveness evaluation6.84no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
SeriesIntel CeleronIntel Alder Lake-N
Power efficiency2.8637.07
Architecture codenameCoffee Lake (2017−2019)Alder Lake-N (2023)
Release date23 April 2019 (5 years ago)3 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$42$128

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron G4930 and Processor N100 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads24
Base clock speed3.2 GHz0.1 GHz
Boost clock speed3.2 GHz3.4 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0no data
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/sno data
L1 cache128 KB96 KB (per core)
L2 cache512 KB2 MB (shared)
L3 cache2 MB6 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm10 nm
Die size126 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature100 °C105 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++

Compatibility

Information on Celeron G4930 and Processor N100 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketFCLGA1151Intel BGA 1264
Power consumption (TDP)54 Watt6 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron G4930 and Processor N100. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2no data
AES-NI++
FMA-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-

Security technologies

Celeron G4930 and Processor N100 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-+
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
MPX+-
Identity Protection+-
SGXYes with Intel® MEno data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron G4930 and Processor N100 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron G4930 and Processor N100. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2400DDR4, DDR5
Maximum memory size64 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth38.397 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel UHD Graphics 610Intel UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N)
Max video memory64 GBno data
Quick Sync Video+-
Clear Video+no data
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency1.05 GHzno data
InTru 3D+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron G4930 and Processor N100 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Celeron G4930 and Processor N100 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution support+no data
Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096x2304@24Hzno data
Max resolution over eDP4096x2304@60Hzno data
Max resolution over DisplayPort4096x2304@60Hzno data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron G4930 and Processor N100 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX12no data
OpenGL4.5no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron G4930 and Processor N100.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes169

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.63 2.35
Integrated graphics card 1.89 2.32
Recency 23 April 2019 3 January 2023
Physical cores 2 4
Threads 2 4
Chip lithography 14 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 54 Watt 6 Watt

Processor N100 has a 44.2% higher aggregate performance score, 22.8% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 3 years, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, a 40% more advanced lithography process, and 800% lower power consumption.

The Processor N100 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron G4930 in performance tests.

Note that Celeron G4930 is a desktop processor while Processor N100 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron G4930 and Processor N100, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron G4930
Celeron G4930
Intel Processor N100
Processor N100

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 124 votes

Rate Celeron G4930 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 1262 votes

Rate Processor N100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron G4930 or Processor N100, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.