Xeon Bronze 3204 vs Celeron G4900

VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron G4900
2018
2 cores / 2 threads, 54 Watt
1.56
Xeon Bronze 3204
2019
6 cores / 6 threads, 85 Watt
3.16
+103%

Xeon Bronze 3204 outperforms Celeron G4900 by a whopping 103% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron G4900 and Xeon Bronze 3204 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking21341624
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.9513.17
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
SeriesIntel CeleronIntel Xeon Bronze
Power efficiency2.633.39
Architecture codenameCoffee Lake (2017−2019)Cascade Lake (2019−2020)
Release date2 April 2018 (6 years ago)2 April 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$42$213

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon Bronze 3204 has 346% better value for money than Celeron G4900.

Detailed specifications

Celeron G4900 and Xeon Bronze 3204 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads26
Base clock speed3.1 GHz1.9 GHz
Boost clock speed3.1 GHz1.9 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0no data
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/sno data
Multiplier3119
L1 cache128 KB384 KB
L2 cache512 KB6 MB
L3 cache2 MB8.25 MB
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Die size126 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature100 °C77 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °Cno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++

Compatibility

Information on Celeron G4900 and Xeon Bronze 3204 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)2 (Multiprocessor)
SocketFCLGA1151FCLGA3647
Power consumption (TDP)54 Watt85 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron G4900 and Xeon Bronze 3204. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX-+
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology--
TSX-+
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data-
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Celeron G4900 and Xeon Bronze 3204 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-+
EDB++
Secure Key+no data
MPX+-
Identity Protection+-
SGXYes with Intel® MEno data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron G4900 and Xeon Bronze 3204 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron G4900 and Xeon Bronze 3204. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2400DDR4-2133
Maximum memory size64 GB1 TB
Max memory channels26
Maximum memory bandwidth38.397 GB/s102.403 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel UHD Graphics 610no data
Max video memory64 GBno data
Quick Sync Video+-
Clear Video+no data
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency1.05 GHzno data
InTru 3D+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron G4900 and Xeon Bronze 3204 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Celeron G4900 and Xeon Bronze 3204 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution support+no data
Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096x2304@24Hzno data
Max resolution over eDP4096x2304@60Hzno data
Max resolution over DisplayPort4096x2304@60Hzno data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron G4900 and Xeon Bronze 3204 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX12no data
OpenGL4.5no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron G4900 and Xeon Bronze 3204.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes1648

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron G4900 1.56
Xeon Bronze 3204 3.16
+103%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron G4900 2394
Xeon Bronze 3204 4832
+102%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Celeron G4900 605
Xeon Bronze 3204 693
+14.5%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Celeron G4900 1031
Xeon Bronze 3204 2914
+183%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.56 3.16
Recency 2 April 2018 2 April 2019
Physical cores 2 6
Threads 2 6
Power consumption (TDP) 54 Watt 85 Watt

Celeron G4900 has 57.4% lower power consumption.

Xeon Bronze 3204, on the other hand, has a 102.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, and 200% more physical cores and 200% more threads.

The Xeon Bronze 3204 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron G4900 in performance tests.

Note that Celeron G4900 is a desktop processor while Xeon Bronze 3204 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron G4900 and Xeon Bronze 3204, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron G4900
Celeron G4900
Intel Xeon Bronze 3204
Xeon Bronze 3204

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 115 votes

Rate Celeron G4900 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.4 22 votes

Rate Xeon Bronze 3204 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron G4900 or Xeon Bronze 3204, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.