Celeron G6900E vs G4900

VS

Primary details

Comparing Celeron G4900 and Celeron G6900E processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2177not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.95no data
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Celeronno data
Power efficiency2.78no data
Architecture codenameCoffee Lake (2017−2019)Alder Lake-S (2022)
Release date3 April 2018 (6 years ago)4 January 2022 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$42no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron G4900 and Celeron G6900E basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speed3.1 GHz3 GHz
Boost clock speed3.1 GHz3 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0no data
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/sno data
Multiplier31no data
L1 cache64K (per core)80K (per core)
L2 cache256K (per core)1.25 MB (per core)
L3 cache6 MB (shared)4 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm10 nm
Die size126 mm2no data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °Cno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++

Compatibility

Information on Celeron G4900 and Celeron G6900E compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
Socket11511700
Power consumption (TDP)51 Watt46 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron G4900 and Celeron G6900E. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
TSX-+

Security technologies

Celeron G4900 and Celeron G6900E technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron G4900 and Celeron G6900E are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron G4900 and Celeron G6900E. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Dual-channelDDR4, DDR5 Dual-channel
Maximum memory size64 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth38.397 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel UHD Graphics 610Intel UHD Graphics 710

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron G4900 and Celeron G6900E.

PCIe version3.05.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Celeron G4900 604
Celeron G6900E 1561
+158%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Celeron G4900 1031
Celeron G6900E 2702
+162%

Pros & cons summary


Integrated graphics card 1.89 2.86
Recency 3 April 2018 4 January 2022
Chip lithography 14 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 51 Watt 46 Watt

Celeron G6900E has 51.3% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 3 years, a 40% more advanced lithography process, and 10.9% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Celeron G4900 and Celeron G6900E. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron G4900 and Celeron G6900E, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron G4900
Celeron G4900
Intel Celeron G6900E
Celeron G6900E

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 119 votes

Rate Celeron G4900 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.4 7 votes

Rate Celeron G6900E on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron G4900 or Celeron G6900E, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.