Celeron 6305 vs G4900

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

Celeron G4900
2018
2 cores / 2 threads
1.57
+16.3%
Celeron 6305
2020
2 cores / 2 threads
1.35

G4900 outperforms 6305 by 16% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

General info

Comparing Celeron G4900 and Celeron 6305 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking19872114
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Value for money2.95no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
SeriesIntel CeleronIntel Tiger Lake
Architecture codenameCoffee Lake (2017−2019)Tiger Lake-U
Release date3 April 2018 (6 years ago)1 September 2020 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$42no data
Current price$61 (1.5x MSRP)no data

Value for money

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Technical specs

Celeron G4900 and Celeron 6305 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speed3.1 GHzno data
Boost clock speed3.1 GHz1.8 GHz
Bus support4 × 8 GT/sno data
L1 cache64K (per core)160 KB
L2 cache256K (per core)2.5 MB
L3 cache6 MB (shared)4 MB
Chip lithography14 nm10 nm SuperFin
Die size126 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature100 °C100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °Cno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Celeron G4900 and Celeron 6305 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA1151FCBGA1449
Power consumption (TDP)54 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron G4900 and Celeron 6305. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
AVXno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology--
TSX-no data
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
SIPP--
StatusLaunchedDiscontinued

Security technologies

Celeron G4900 and Celeron 6305 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT--
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
MPX+no data
Identity Protection+no data
SGXYes with Intel® ME-
OS Guard++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron G4900 and Celeron 6305 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron G4900 and Celeron 6305. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2400DDR4, DDR4
Maximum memory size64 GB64 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth37.5 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel UHD Graphics 610Intel® UHD Graphics for 11th Gen Intel® Processors
Max video memory64 GBno data
Quick Sync Video++
Clear Video+no data
Clear Video HD++
Graphics max frequency1.05 GHz1.25 GHz
Execution Unitsno data48
InTru 3D+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron G4900 and Celeron 6305 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported34

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Celeron G4900 and Celeron 6305 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution support+no data
Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096x2304@24Hz4096x2304@60Hz
Max resolution over eDP4096x2304@60Hz4096x2304@60Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPort4096x2304@60Hz7680x4320@60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron G4900 and Celeron 6305 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX1212.1
OpenGL4.54.6

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron G4900 and Celeron 6305.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes16no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron G4900 1.57
+16.3%
Celeron 6305 1.35

G4900 outperforms 6305 by 16% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Celeron G4900 2442
+15.9%
Celeron 6305 2107

G4900 outperforms 6305 by 16% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Celeron G4900 619
Celeron 6305 746
+20.5%

6305 outperforms G4900 by 21% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Celeron G4900 1053
Celeron 6305 1248
+18.5%

6305 outperforms G4900 by 19% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Gaming performance

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance score 1.57 1.35
Recency 3 April 2018 1 September 2020
Chip lithography 14 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 54 Watt 15 Watt

The Celeron G4900 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron 6305 in performance tests.

Note that Celeron G4900 is a desktop processor while Celeron 6305 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron G4900 and Celeron 6305, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron G4900
Celeron G4900
Intel Celeron 6305
Celeron 6305

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

User Ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 91 vote

Rate Celeron G4900 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 131 vote

Rate Celeron 6305 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron G4900 or Celeron 6305, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.