Xeon w7-3555 vs Celeron G470

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron G470
2013
1 core / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.33
Xeon w7-3555
2024, $2,339
28 cores / 56 threads, 325 Watt
38.42
+11542%

Xeon w7-3555 outperforms Celeron G470 by a whopping 11542% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking333293
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data17.48
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Power efficiency1.0112.67
DesignerIntelIntel
Manufacturerno dataIntel
Architecture codenameno dataSapphire Rapids (2023−2024)
Release date1 April 2013 (12 years ago)24 August 2024 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$2,339

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

Celeron G470 and Xeon w7-3555 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)28 (Octacosa-Core)
Performance-coresno data28
Threads256
Base clock speed2 GHz2.7 GHz
Boost clock speedno data4.8 GHz
Bus rate5 GT/sno data
L1 cacheno data80 KB (per core)
L2 cacheno data2 MB (per core)
L3 cache1.5 MB Intel® Smart Cache75 MB
Chip lithography32 nmIntel 7 nm
Die sizeno data4x 477 mm2
Maximum core temperature66 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data78 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron G470 and Xeon w7-3555 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA1155FCLGA4677
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt325 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron G470 and Xeon w7-3555. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® AMX, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technology-2.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX-+
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access+no data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data+
FDI+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Celeron G470 and Xeon w7-3555 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-+
EDB++
SGXno data-
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron G470 and Xeon w7-3555 are enumerated here.

VT-d-+
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron G470 and Xeon w7-3555. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-1066, DDR3-1333DDR5-4800
Maximum memory size32 GB4 TB
Max memory channels28
Maximum memory bandwidth17 GB/sno data
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics for 2nd Generation Intel ProcessorsN/A
Graphics max frequency1 GHzno data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron G470 and Xeon w7-3555 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported2no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron G470 and Xeon w7-3555.

PCIe version2.05.0
PCI Express lanesno data112

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Celeron G470 0.33
Xeon w7-3555 38.42
+11542%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Celeron G470 577
Samples: 48
Xeon w7-3555 67754
+11642%
Samples: 3

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.33 38.42
Recency 1 April 2013 24 August 2024
Physical cores 1 28
Threads 2 56
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 325 Watt

Celeron G470 has 828.6% lower power consumption.

Xeon w7-3555, on the other hand, has a 11542.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 years, and 2700% more physical cores and 2700% more threads.

The Intel Xeon w7-3555 is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Celeron G470 in performance tests.

Note that Celeron G470 is a desktop processor while Xeon w7-3555 is a server/workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron G470
Celeron G470
Intel Xeon w7-3555
Xeon w7-3555

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.4 33 votes

Rate Celeron G470 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon w7-3555 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Celeron G470 and Xeon w7-3555, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.