Ryzen 7 5800X3D vs Celeron G465
Primary details
Comparing Celeron G465 and Ryzen 7 5800X3D processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | 343 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 28.05 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Desktop processor |
| Series | no data | AMD Ryzen 7 |
| Power efficiency | no data | 16.06 |
| Architecture codename | Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) | Vermeer (Zen3) (2020−2022) |
| Release date | 1 September 2012 (12 years ago) | 20 April 2022 (2 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $80 | $449 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Celeron G465 and Ryzen 7 5800X3D basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 8 (Octa-Core) |
| Threads | 2 | 16 |
| Base clock speed | 1.9 GHz | 3.4 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1.9 GHz | 4.5 GHz |
| Bus rate | 5 GT/s | no data |
| L1 cache | 64 KB | 512 KB |
| L2 cache | 256 KB | 4 MB |
| L3 cache | 1.5 MB | 96 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 7 nm, 12 nm |
| Die size | 131 mm2 | 74 + 125 mm |
| Maximum core temperature | 66 °C | 90 °C |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 90 °C |
| Number of transistors | 504 million | 8,850 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron G465 and Ryzen 7 5800X3D compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | FCLGA1155 | AM4 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 105 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron G465 and Ryzen 7 5800X3D. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2 | 86x MMX(+), SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A,-64, AMD-V, AES, AVX, AVX2, FMA3, SHA, Precision Boost 2 |
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
| Turbo Boost Technology | - | no data |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | + | no data |
| Idle States | + | no data |
| Thermal Monitoring | + | - |
| Flex Memory Access | + | no data |
| FDI | + | no data |
| Fast Memory Access | + | no data |
| Precision Boost 2 | no data | + |
Security technologies
Celeron G465 and Ryzen 7 5800X3D technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | - | no data |
| EDB | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron G465 and Ryzen 7 5800X3D are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
| VT-d | - | no data |
| VT-x | + | no data |
| EPT | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron G465 and Ryzen 7 5800X3D. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR4-3200 |
| Maximum memory size | 32 GB | 128 GB |
| Max memory channels | 2 | no data |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 17 GB/s | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Intel® HD Graphics for 2nd Generation Intel® Processors | N/A |
| Graphics max frequency | 1 GHz | no data |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of Celeron G465 and Ryzen 7 5800X3D integrated GPUs.
| Number of displays supported | 2 | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron G465 and Ryzen 7 5800X3D.
| PCIe version | 2.0 | 4.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 20 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
GeekBench 5 Single-Core
GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 1 September 2012 | 20 April 2022 |
| Physical cores | 1 | 8 |
| Threads | 2 | 16 |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 7 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 105 Watt |
Celeron G465 has 200% lower power consumption.
Ryzen 7 5800X3D, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 9 years, 700% more physical cores and 700% more threads, and a 357.1% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Celeron G465 and Ryzen 7 5800X3D. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron G465 and Ryzen 7 5800X3D, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
