Ryzen 5 6600H vs Celeron G465

VS

Primary details

Comparing Celeron G465 and Ryzen 5 6600H processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated652
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataAMD Rembrandt (Zen 3+)
Power efficiencyno data24.76
Architecture codenameSandy Bridge (2011−2013)Rembrandt-H (Zen 3+) (2022)
Release date1 September 2012 (12 years ago)January 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$80no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron G465 and Ryzen 5 6600H basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads212
Base clock speed1.9 GHz3.3 GHz
Boost clock speed1.9 GHz4.5 GHz
Bus rate5 GT/sno data
L1 cache64 KB64K (per core)
L2 cache256 KB512K (per core)
L3 cache1.5 MB16 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm6 nm
Die size131 mm2208 mm2
Maximum core temperature66 °C95 °C
Number of transistors504 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Celeron G465 and Ryzen 5 6600H compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA1155FP7
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt45 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron G465 and Ryzen 5 6600H. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
AES-NI-+
FMA-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access+no data
FDI+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Celeron G465 and Ryzen 5 6600H technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron G465 and Ryzen 5 6600H are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d-no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron G465 and Ryzen 5 6600H. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR5
Maximum memory size32 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth17 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® HD Graphics for 2nd Generation Intel® ProcessorsAMD Radeon 660M
Graphics max frequency1 GHzno data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron G465 and Ryzen 5 6600H integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported2no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron G465 and Ryzen 5 6600H.

PCIe version2.04.0
PCI Express lanesno data20

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron G465 547
Ryzen 5 6600H 18703
+3319%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Celeron G465 301
Ryzen 5 6600H 1810
+501%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Celeron G465 410
Ryzen 5 6600H 7455
+1718%

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 1 6
Threads 2 12
Chip lithography 32 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 45 Watt

Celeron G465 has 28.6% lower power consumption.

Ryzen 5 6600H, on the other hand, has 500% more physical cores and 500% more threads, and a 433.3% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Celeron G465 and Ryzen 5 6600H. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that Celeron G465 is a desktop processor while Ryzen 5 6600H is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron G465 and Ryzen 5 6600H, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron G465
Celeron G465
AMD Ryzen 5 6600H
Ryzen 5 6600H

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


1.7 6 votes

Rate Celeron G465 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 781 vote

Rate Ryzen 5 6600H on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron G465 or Ryzen 5 6600H, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.