Atom D525 vs Celeron G465

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Celeron G465 and Atom D525 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataIntel Atom
Architecture codenameSandy Bridge (2011−2013)Pinetrail (2009−2010)
Release date1 September 2012 (11 years ago)21 June 2010 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$80$63
Current price$18.97 (0.2x MSRP)$320 (5.1x MSRP)

Detailed specifications

Celeron G465 and Atom D525 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads24
Base clock speed1.9 GHz1.8 GHz
Boost clock speed1.9 GHz1.83 GHz
L1 cache64 KB64K (per core)
L2 cache256 KB512K (per core)
L3 cache1.5 MB0 KB
Chip lithography32 nm45 nm
Die size131 mm266 mm2
Maximum core temperature66 °C100 °C
Number of transistors504 million176 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Celeron G465 and Atom D525 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA1155FCBGA559
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt13 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron G465 and Atom D525. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2Intel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3
AES-NI--
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+-
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology++
Idle States+-
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access+no data
Demand Based Switchingno data-
PAEno data32 Bit
FDI+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data
StatusDiscontinuedDiscontinued

Security technologies

Celeron G465 and Atom D525 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT--
EDB++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron G465 and Atom D525 are enumerated here.

VT-d--
VT-x+-
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron G465 and Atom D525. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR2, DDR3
Maximum memory size32 GB4 GB
Max memory channels21
Maximum memory bandwidth17 GB/s6.4 GB/s
ECC memory supportno data-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® HD Graphics for 2nd Generation Intel® ProcessorsIntel GMA 3150
Graphics max frequency1 GHzno data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron G465 and Atom D525 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported2no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron G465 and Atom D525.

PCIe version2.0no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Celeron G465 547
+36.8%
Atom D525 400

Celeron G465 outperforms Atom D525 by 37% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Celeron G465 301
+296%
Atom D525 76

Celeron G465 outperforms Atom D525 by 296% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Celeron G465 410
+119%
Atom D525 187

Celeron G465 outperforms Atom D525 by 119% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 September 2012 21 June 2010
Physical cores 1 2
Threads 2 4
Cost $80 $63
Chip lithography 32 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 13 Watt

We couldn't decide between Celeron G465 and Atom D525. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that Celeron G465 is a desktop processor while Atom D525 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron G465 and Atom D525, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron G465
Celeron G465
Intel Atom D525
Atom D525

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


1.7 6 votes

Rate Celeron G465 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 187 votes

Rate Atom D525 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron G465 or Atom D525, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.