Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 vs Celeron G460
Primary details
Comparing Celeron G460 and Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | not rated | 439 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
Series | no data | AMD Strix Point (Zen 5/5c, Ryzen AI 3/5/7/9) |
Power efficiency | no data | 52.46 |
Architecture codename | Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) | Strix Point (Zen 5) (2024) |
Release date | 12 December 2011 (12 years ago) | 1 October 2024 (less than a year ago) |
Launch price (MSRP) | $65 | no data |
Detailed specifications
Celeron G460 and Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 8 (Octa-Core) |
Threads | 2 | 16 AMD Zen 5 AMD Zen 5c |
Base clock speed | 1.8 GHz | no data |
Boost clock speed | 1.8 GHz | 5.1 GHz |
Bus rate | 5 GT/s | 54 MHz |
L1 cache | 64 KB | no data |
L2 cache | 256 KB | no data |
L3 cache | 1.5 MB | no data |
Chip lithography | 32 nm | 4 nm |
Die size | 131 mm2 | no data |
Maximum core temperature | 66 °C | no data |
Number of transistors | 504 million | no data |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron G460 and Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | no data |
Socket | FCLGA1155 | FP8 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 28 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron G460 and Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2 | USB 4, XDNA 2 NPU (50 TOPS), Secure Processor, SMT, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A |
AES-NI | - | + |
AVX | - | + |
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
Turbo Boost Technology | - | no data |
Hyper-Threading Technology | + | no data |
Idle States | + | no data |
Thermal Monitoring | + | - |
Flex Memory Access | + | no data |
FDI | + | no data |
Fast Memory Access | + | no data |
Security technologies
Celeron G460 and Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
TXT | - | no data |
EDB | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron G460 and Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 are enumerated here.
VT-d | - | no data |
VT-x | + | no data |
EPT | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron G460 and Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR5 |
Maximum memory size | 32 GB | no data |
Max memory channels | 2 | no data |
Maximum memory bandwidth | 17 GB/s | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card | Intel® HD Graphics for 2nd Generation Intel® Processors | AMD Radeon 880M |
Graphics max frequency | 1 GHz | no data |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of Celeron G460 and Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 integrated GPUs.
Number of displays supported | 2 | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron G460 and Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360.
PCIe version | 2.0 | no data |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
Recency | 12 December 2011 | 1 October 2024 |
Physical cores | 1 | 8 |
Threads | 2 | 16 AMD Zen 5 AMD Zen 5c |
Chip lithography | 32 nm | 4 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 28 Watt |
Celeron G460 has -87.5% more threads.
Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 12 years, 700% more physical cores, a 700% more advanced lithography process, and 25% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Celeron G460 and Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that Celeron G460 is a desktop processor while Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron G460 and Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.