Ultra 9 285K vs Celeron G3930TE

VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron G3930TE
2017
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
1.40
Core Ultra 9 285K
2024
24 cores / 24 threads, 125 Watt
43.04
+2974%

Core Ultra 9 285K outperforms Celeron G3930TE by a whopping 2974% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron G3930TE and Core Ultra 9 285K processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking222654
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data74.27
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Celeronno data
Power efficiency3.7832.56
Architecture codenameKaby Lake (2016−2019)Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025)
Release date12 June 2017 (7 years ago)24 October 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$42$589

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron G3930TE and Core Ultra 9 285K basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)24 (Tetracosa-Core)
Performance-coresno data8
Efficient-coresno data16
Threads224
Base clock speed2.7 GHz3.7 GHz
Boost clock speed2.7 GHz5.6 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0no data
Bus rate8 GT/s250 MHz
Multiplier27no data
L1 cache128 KB112 KB (per core)
L2 cache512 KB3 MB (per core)
L3 cache2 MB36 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm3 nm
Die sizeno data243 mm2
Maximum core temperature88 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data17,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Celeron G3930TE and Core Ultra 9 285K compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketFCLGA1151FCLGA1851
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt125 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron G3930TE and Core Ultra 9 285K. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
AVX-+
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technology-2.0
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
TSX-+
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
SIPP-+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data+
Deep Learning Boost-+
Supported AI Software Frameworks-OpenVINO™, WindowsML, DirectML, ONNX RT, WebNN

Security technologies

Celeron G3930TE and Core Ultra 9 285K technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-+
EDB++
Secure Key++
MPX+-
Identity Protection+-
SGXYes with Intel® MEno data
OS Guard++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron G3930TE and Core Ultra 9 285K are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron G3930TE and Core Ultra 9 285K. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2133, DDR3L-1600DDR5-6400
Maximum memory size64 GB192 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth38.397 GB/sno data
ECC memory support++

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics 610Intel® Graphics
Max video memory64 GBno data
Quick Sync Video++
Clear Video+no data
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency950 MHz2 GHz
InTru 3D+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron G3930TE and Core Ultra 9 285K integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported34

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Celeron G3930TE and Core Ultra 9 285K integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution support+no data
Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096x2304@24Hz4K @ 60Hz (HDMI 2.1 TMDS) 8K @ 60Hz (HDMI2.1 FRL)
Max resolution over eDP4096X2304@60Hz4K @ 60Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPort4096x2304@60Hz8K @ 60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron G3930TE and Core Ultra 9 285K integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX1212
OpenGL4.44.5

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron G3930TE and Core Ultra 9 285K.

PCIe version3.05.0 and 4.0
PCI Express lanes1620

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron G3930TE 1.40
Ultra 9 285K 43.04
+2974%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron G3930TE 2218
Ultra 9 285K 68370
+2983%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.40 43.04
Recency 12 June 2017 24 October 2024
Physical cores 2 24
Threads 2 24
Chip lithography 14 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 125 Watt

Celeron G3930TE has 257.1% lower power consumption.

Ultra 9 285K, on the other hand, has a 2974.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, 1100% more physical cores and 1100% more threads, and a 366.7% more advanced lithography process.

The Core Ultra 9 285K is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron G3930TE in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron G3930TE and Core Ultra 9 285K, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron G3930TE
Celeron G3930TE
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K
Core Ultra 9 285K

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2 3 votes

Rate Celeron G3930TE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 168 votes

Rate Core Ultra 9 285K on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron G3930TE or Core Ultra 9 285K, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.