Xeon E-2176M vs Celeron G3930

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron G3930
2017
2 cores / 2 threads, 51 Watt
1.45
Xeon E-2176M
2018
6 cores / 12 threads, 45 Watt
7.04
+386%

Xeon E-2176M outperforms Celeron G3930 by a whopping 386% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron G3930 and Xeon E-2176M processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking2101943
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.831.36
Market segmentDesktop processorMobile workstation
SeriesIntel CeleronIntel Xeon E
Architecture codenameKaby Lake (2016−2019)Coffee Lake-H (2018−2019)
Release date3 January 2017 (7 years ago)1 March 2018 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$42$450
Current price$121 (2.9x MSRP)$2916 (6.5x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon E-2176M has 64% better value for money than Celeron G3930.

Detailed specifications

Celeron G3930 and Xeon E-2176M basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads212
Base clock speed2.9 GHz2.7 GHz
Boost clock speed2.9 GHz4.4 GHz
Bus support8 GT/sno data
L1 cache64K (per core)384 KB
L2 cache256K (per core)1.5 MB
L3 cache2 MB (shared)12 MB
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Die sizeno data149 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °C100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)65 °Cno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Celeron G3930 and Xeon E-2176M compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA1151BGA-1440
Power consumption (TDP)51 Watt45 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron G3930 and Xeon E-2176M. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
AVXno data+
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shiftno data+
My WiFino data+
Turbo Boost Technology-2.0
Hyper-Threading Technology-+
TSX-+
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Accessno data+
SIPP-+
StatusDiscontinuedLaunched

Security technologies

Celeron G3930 and Xeon E-2176M technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-+
EDB++
Secure Key++
MPX++
Identity Protection++
SGXYes with Intel® MEYes with Intel® ME
OS Guard++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron G3930 and Xeon E-2176M are enumerated here.

AMD-Vno data+
VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron G3930 and Xeon E-2176M. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2133, DDR3L-1333, DDR3L-1600DDR4
Maximum memory size64 GB64 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth38.397 GB/s42.671 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel HD Graphics 610Intel UHD Graphics P630
Max video memory64 GB64 GB
Quick Sync Video++
Clear Video++
Clear Video HD++
Graphics max frequency1.05 GHz1.2 GHz
InTru 3D++

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron G3930 and Xeon E-2176M integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported33
eDPno data+
DisplayPortno data+
HDMIno data+
DVIno data+

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Celeron G3930 and Xeon E-2176M integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution support++
Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096x2304@24Hz4096x2304@30Hz
Max resolution over eDP4096x2304@60Hz4096x2304@30Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPort4096x2304@60Hz4096x2304@30Hz
Max resolution over VGAno dataN/A

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron G3930 and Xeon E-2176M integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX1212
OpenGL4.44.5

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron G3930 and Xeon E-2176M.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes1616

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron G3930 1.45
Xeon E-2176M 7.04
+386%

Xeon E-2176M outperforms Celeron G3930 by 386% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Celeron G3930 2237
Xeon E-2176M 10886
+387%

Xeon E-2176M outperforms Celeron G3930 by 387% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Celeron G3930 607
Xeon E-2176M 1380
+127%

Xeon E-2176M outperforms Celeron G3930 by 127% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Celeron G3930 1040
Xeon E-2176M 4905
+372%

Xeon E-2176M outperforms Celeron G3930 by 372% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.45 7.04
Recency 3 January 2017 1 March 2018
Physical cores 2 6
Threads 2 12
Cost $42 $450
Power consumption (TDP) 51 Watt 45 Watt

The Xeon E-2176M is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron G3930 in performance tests.

Be aware that Celeron G3930 is a desktop processor while Xeon E-2176M is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron G3930 and Xeon E-2176M, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron G3930
Celeron G3930
Intel Xeon E-2176M
Xeon E-2176M

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 220 votes

Rate Celeron G3930 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 163 votes

Rate Xeon E-2176M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron G3930 or Xeon E-2176M, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.