Pentium P6200 vs Celeron G3930

Aggregate performance score

Celeron G3930
2017
2 cores / 2 threads, 51 Watt
1.42
+149%
Pentium P6200
2010
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.57

Celeron G3930 outperforms Pentium P6200 by a whopping 149% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron G3930 and Pentium P6200 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking21932812
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.69no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
SeriesIntel CeleronIntel Pentium
Power efficiency2.631.54
Architecture codenameKaby Lake (2016−2019)Arrandale (2010−2011)
Release date3 January 2017 (7 years ago)26 September 2010 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$42$60

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron G3930 and Pentium P6200 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speed2.9 GHz2.13 GHz
Boost clock speed2.9 GHz0.13 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0DMI 1.0
Bus rate8 GT/s1 × 2.5 GT/s
Multiplier2916
L1 cache64K (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache256K (per core)256K (per core)
L3 cache2 MB (shared)3 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm32 nm
Die sizeno data81+114 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °C90 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)65 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data384 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Celeron G3930 and Pentium P6200 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCLGA1151PGA988
Power consumption (TDP)51 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron G3930 and Pentium P6200. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2no data
AES-NI+-
FMA-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology--
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Accessno data+
Demand Based Switchingno data-
PAEno data36 Bit
FDIno data+
Fast Memory Accessno data+

Security technologies

Celeron G3930 and Pentium P6200 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT--
EDB++
Secure Key+no data
MPX+-
Identity Protection+-
SGXYes with Intel® MEno data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron G3930 and Pentium P6200 are enumerated here.

VT-d+-
VT-x+-
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron G3930 and Pentium P6200. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 2133, DDR3L 1333/1600DDR3
Maximum memory size64 GB8 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth38.397 GB/s17.051 GB/s
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics 610Intel® HD Graphics for Previous Generation Intel® Processors
Max video memory64 GBno data
Quick Sync Video+-
Clear Video++
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency1.05 GHz667 MHz
InTru 3D+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron G3930 and Pentium P6200 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported32

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Celeron G3930 and Pentium P6200 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution support+no data
Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096x2304@24Hzno data
Max resolution over eDP4096x2304@60Hzno data
Max resolution over DisplayPort4096x2304@60Hzno data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron G3930 and Pentium P6200 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX12no data
OpenGL4.4no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron G3930 and Pentium P6200.

PCIe version3.02.0
PCI Express lanes1616

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron G3930 1.42
+149%
Pentium P6200 0.57

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron G3930 2249
+148%
Pentium P6200 908

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Celeron G3930 605
+112%
Pentium P6200 285

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Celeron G3930 1033
+116%
Pentium P6200 479

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.42 0.57
Recency 3 January 2017 26 September 2010
Chip lithography 14 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 51 Watt 35 Watt

Celeron G3930 has a 149.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, and a 128.6% more advanced lithography process.

Pentium P6200, on the other hand, has 45.7% lower power consumption.

The Celeron G3930 is our recommended choice as it beats the Pentium P6200 in performance tests.

Note that Celeron G3930 is a desktop processor while Pentium P6200 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron G3930 and Pentium P6200, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron G3930
Celeron G3930
Intel Pentium P6200
Pentium P6200

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 237 votes

Rate Celeron G3930 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 302 votes

Rate Pentium P6200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron G3930 or Pentium P6200, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.