Celeron N2808 vs G3930

Place in the ranking	2195	3082
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	0.69	no data
Market segment	Desktop processor	Laptop
Series	Intel Celeron	Intel Celeron
Power efficiency	2.63	7.57
Architecture codename	Kaby Lake (2016−2019)	Bay Trail-M (2013−2014)
Release date	3 January 2017 (7 years ago)	22 May 2014 (10 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$42	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron G3930 and Celeron N2808 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores	2 (Dual-core)	2 (Dual-core)
Threads	2	2
Base clock speed	2.9 GHz	1.58 GHz
Boost clock speed	2.9 GHz	2.25 GHz
Bus type	DMI 3.0	no data
Bus rate	8 GT/s	no data
Multiplier	29	no data
L1 cache	64K (per core)	56K (per core)
L2 cache	256K (per core)	512K (per core)
L3 cache	2 MB (shared)	0 KB
Chip lithography	14 nm	22 nm
Maximum core temperature	100 °C	100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)	65 °C	no data
64 bit support	+	+
Windows 11 compatibility	-	-

Compatibility

Information on Celeron G3930 and Celeron N2808 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration	1 (Uniprocessor)	1
Socket	FCLGA1151	FCBGA1170
Power consumption (TDP)	51 Watt	4.5 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron G3930 and Celeron N2808. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions	Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2	no data
AES-NI	+	-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)	+	+
Turbo Boost Technology	-	-
Hyper-Threading Technology	-	-
Idle States	+	+
Thermal Monitoring	+	-
Smart Connect	no data	+

Security technologies

Celeron G3930 and Celeron N2808 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT	-	no data
EDB	+	+
Secure Key	+	+
MPX	+	-
Identity Protection	+	-
SGX	Yes with Intel® ME	no data
OS Guard	+	no data
Anti-Theft	no data	-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron G3930 and Celeron N2808 are enumerated here.

VT-d	+	-
VT-x	+	+
EPT	+	no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron G3930 and Celeron N2808. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory types	DDR4 2133, DDR3L 1333/1600	DDR3
Maximum memory size	64 GB	4 GB
Max memory channels	2	1
Maximum memory bandwidth	38.397 GB/s	10.66 GB/s
ECC memory support	+	-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card Compare	Intel HD Graphics 610	Intel HD Graphics for Intel Atom Processor Z3700 Series
Max video memory	64 GB	no data
Quick Sync Video	+	+
Clear Video	+	no data
Clear Video HD	+	-
Graphics max frequency	1.05 GHz	792 MHz
InTru 3D	+	-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron G3930 and Celeron N2808 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Celeron G3930 and Celeron N2808 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution support	+	no data
Max resolution over HDMI 1.4	4096x2304@24Hz	no data
Max resolution over eDP	4096x2304@60Hz	no data
Max resolution over DisplayPort	4096x2304@60Hz	no data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron G3930 and Celeron N2808 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX	12	no data
OpenGL	4.4	no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron G3930 and Celeron N2808.

PCIe version	3.0	2.0
PCI Express lanes	16	4
USB revision	no data	3.0 and 2.0
Total number of SATA ports	no data	2
Number of USB ports	no data	5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron G3930 1.42
+344%

Celeron N2808 0.32

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron G3930 2249
+341%

Celeron N2808 510

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	1.42	0.32
Integrated graphics card	1.85	0.77
Recency	3 January 2017	22 May 2014
Chip lithography	14 nm	22 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	51 Watt	4 Watt

Celeron G3930 has a 343.8% higher aggregate performance score, 140.3% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 2 years, and a 57.1% more advanced lithography process.

Celeron N2808, on the other hand, has 1175% lower power consumption.

The Celeron G3930 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron N2808 in performance tests.

Note that Celeron G3930 is a desktop processor while Celeron N2808 is a notebook one.

Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron G3930 and Celeron N2808, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.