Athlon II X2 220 vs Celeron G3930

VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron G3930
2017
2 cores / 2 threads, 51 Watt
1.42
+115%
Athlon II X2 220
2010
2 cores / 2 threads, 65 Watt
0.66

Celeron G3930 outperforms Athlon II X2 220 by a whopping 115% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron G3930 and Athlon II X2 220 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking21932741
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.695.30
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Celeronno data
Power efficiency2.630.96
Architecture codenameKaby Lake (2016−2019)Regor (2009−2013)
Release date3 January 2017 (7 years ago)21 September 2010 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$42$32

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Athlon II X2 220 has 668% better value for money than Celeron G3930.

Detailed specifications

Celeron G3930 and Athlon II X2 220 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speed2.9 GHz2.8 GHz
Boost clock speed2.9 GHz2.8 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0no data
Bus rate8 GT/sno data
Multiplier29no data
L1 cache64K (per core)128 KB
L2 cache256K (per core)512 KB
L3 cache2 MB (shared)0 KB
Chip lithography14 nm45 nm
Die sizeno data117 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)65 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data410 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Celeron G3930 and Athlon II X2 220 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketFCLGA1151AM3
Power consumption (TDP)51 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron G3930 and Athlon II X2 220. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2no data
AES-NI+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-

Security technologies

Celeron G3930 and Athlon II X2 220 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
MPX+-
Identity Protection+-
SGXYes with Intel® MEno data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron G3930 and Athlon II X2 220 are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron G3930 and Athlon II X2 220. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 2133, DDR3L 1333/1600DDR3
Maximum memory size64 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth38.397 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics 610no data
Max video memory64 GBno data
Quick Sync Video+-
Clear Video+no data
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency1.05 GHzno data
InTru 3D+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron G3930 and Athlon II X2 220 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Celeron G3930 and Athlon II X2 220 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution support+no data
Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096x2304@24Hzno data
Max resolution over eDP4096x2304@60Hzno data
Max resolution over DisplayPort4096x2304@60Hzno data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron G3930 and Athlon II X2 220 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX12no data
OpenGL4.4no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron G3930 and Athlon II X2 220.

PCIe version3.02.0
PCI Express lanes16no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron G3930 1.42
+115%
Athlon II X2 220 0.66

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron G3930 2249
+116%
Athlon II X2 220 1043

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Celeron G3930 605
+111%
Athlon II X2 220 287

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Celeron G3930 1033
+109%
Athlon II X2 220 494

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.42 0.66
Recency 3 January 2017 21 September 2010
Chip lithography 14 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 51 Watt 65 Watt

Celeron G3930 has a 115.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, a 221.4% more advanced lithography process, and 27.5% lower power consumption.

The Celeron G3930 is our recommended choice as it beats the Athlon II X2 220 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron G3930 and Athlon II X2 220, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron G3930
Celeron G3930
AMD Athlon II X2 220
Athlon II X2 220

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 237 votes

Rate Celeron G3930 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.9 231 vote

Rate Athlon II X2 220 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron G3930 or Athlon II X2 220, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.