EPYC 9655P vs Celeron G1850

Place in the ranking	2341	1
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	0.16	2.48
Market segment	Desktop processor	Server
Power efficiency	2.10	23.66
Architecture codename	Haswell (2013−2015)	Turin (2024)
Release date	1 May 2014 (10 years ago)	10 October 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$101	$10,811

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

EPYC 9655P has 1450% better value for money than Celeron G1850.

Detailed specifications

Celeron G1850 and EPYC 9655P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores	2 (Dual-core)	96
Threads	2	192
Base clock speed	2.9 GHz	2.6 GHz
Boost clock speed	2.9 GHz	4.5 GHz
Bus rate	5 GT/s	no data
L1 cache	64 KB (per core)	80 KB (per core)
L2 cache	256 KB (per core)	1 MB (per core)
L3 cache	3 MB (shared)	384 MB (shared)
Chip lithography	22 nm	4 nm
Die size	177 mm²	12x 70.6 mm²
Maximum case temperature (TCase)	72 °C	no data
Number of transistors	1,400 million	99,780 million
64 bit support	+	+
Windows 11 compatibility	-	no data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron G1850 and EPYC 9655P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration	1	1
Socket	FCLGA1150	SP5
Power consumption (TDP)	53 Watt	400 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron G1850 and EPYC 9655P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions	Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2	no data
AES-NI	-	+
AVX	-	+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)	+	no data
Turbo Boost Technology	-	no data
Hyper-Threading Technology	-	no data
Idle States	+	no data
Thermal Monitoring	+	-
Precision Boost 2	no data	+

Security technologies

Celeron G1850 and EPYC 9655P technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT	-	no data
EDB	+	no data
Secure Key	+	no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron G1850 and EPYC 9655P are enumerated here.

AMD-V	-	+
VT-d	-	no data
VT-x	+	no data
VT-i	-	no data
EPT	+	no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron G1850 and EPYC 9655P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory types	DDR3	DDR5
Maximum memory size	32 GB	no data
Max memory channels	2	no data
Maximum memory bandwidth	21.3 GB/s	no data
ECC memory support	+	-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card	Intel HD Graphics for 4th Generation Intel Processors	N/A
Max video memory	1.7 GB	no data
Quick Sync Video	+	-
Clear Video HD	+	no data
Graphics max frequency	1.05 GHz	no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron G1850 and EPYC 9655P integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported	3	no data
eDP	+	no data
DisplayPort	+	-
HDMI	+	-
DVI	+	no data
VGA	+	no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Celeron G1850 and EPYC 9655P integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.4	1920x1080@60Hz	no data
Max resolution over eDP	2560x1600@60Hz	no data
Max resolution over DisplayPort	2560x1600@60Hz	no data
Max resolution over VGA	1920x1200@60Hz	no data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron G1850 and EPYC 9655P integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX	11.1/12	no data
OpenGL	4.3	no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron G1850 and EPYC 9655P.

PCIe version	Up to 3.0	5.0
PCI Express lanes	16	128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron G1850 1.20

EPYC 9655P 100.00
+8233%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron G1850 1900

EPYC 9655P 158845
+8260%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	1.20	100.00
Recency	1 May 2014	10 October 2024
Physical cores	2	96
Threads	2	192
Chip lithography	22 nm	4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	53 Watt	400 Watt

Celeron G1850 has 654.7% lower power consumption.

EPYC 9655P, on the other hand, has a 8233.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, 4700% more physical cores and 9500% more threads, and a 450% more advanced lithography process.

The EPYC 9655P is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron G1850 in performance tests.

Note that Celeron G1850 is a desktop processor while EPYC 9655P is a server/workstation one.

Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron G1850 and EPYC 9655P, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.