Xeon E5410 vs Celeron G1840

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

Celeron G1840
2014
2 cores / 2 threads
1.14

Xeon E5410 outperforms Celeron G1840 by 13% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron G1840 and Xeon E5410 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking22622164
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.350.20
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Architecture codenameHaswell (2013−2015)no data
Release date1 May 2014 (10 years ago)1 October 2007 (16 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$53no data
Current price$23 (0.4x MSRP)$52

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Celeron G1840 has 575% better value for money than Xeon E5410.

Detailed specifications

Celeron G1840 and Xeon E5410 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)no data
Threads2no data
Base clock speed2.8 GHz2.33 GHz
Boost clock speed2.8 GHzno data
L1 cache64 KB (per core)no data
L2 cache256 KB (per core)no data
L3 cache3 MB (shared)12 MB L2 Cache
Chip lithography22 nm45 nm
Die size177 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature72 °C67 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,400 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo
VID voltage rangeno data0.85V-1.35V

Compatibility

Information on Celeron G1840 and Xeon E5410 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketFCLGA1150LGA771
Power consumption (TDP)53 Watt80 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron G1840 and Xeon E5410. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2no data
AES-NI-no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology--
TSX-no data
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
SIPP-no data
Demand Based Switchingno data+
FSB parityno data+
StatusDiscontinuedDiscontinued

Security technologies

Celeron G1840 and Xeon E5410 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT--
EDB++
Secure Key+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron G1840 and Xeon E5410 are enumerated here.

VT-d-no data
VT-x++
VT-i-no data
EPT+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron G1840 and Xeon E5410. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3no data
Maximum memory size32 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth21.3 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® HD Graphics for 4th Generation Intel® Processorsno data
Max video memory1.7 GBno data
Quick Sync Video+no data
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency1.05 GHzno data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron G1840 and Xeon E5410 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+no data
HDMI+no data
DVI+no data
VGA+no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Celeron G1840 and Xeon E5410 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.41920x1080@60Hzno data
Max resolution over eDP2560x1600@60Hzno data
Max resolution over DisplayPort2560x1600@60Hzno data
Max resolution over VGA1920x1200@60Hzno data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron G1840 and Xeon E5410 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX11.1/12no data
OpenGL4.3no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron G1840 and Xeon E5410.

PCIe versionUp to 3.0no data
PCI Express lanes16no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron G1840 1.14
Xeon E5410 1.29
+13.2%

Xeon E5410 outperforms Celeron G1840 by 13% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Celeron G1840 1769
Xeon E5410 1990
+12.5%

Xeon E5410 outperforms Celeron G1840 by 12% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Celeron G1840 506
+48.8%
Xeon E5410 340

Celeron G1840 outperforms Xeon E5410 by 49% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Celeron G1840 858
Xeon E5410 1116
+30.1%

Xeon E5410 outperforms Celeron G1840 by 30% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.14 1.29
Recency 1 May 2014 1 October 2007
Chip lithography 22 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 53 Watt 80 Watt

The Xeon E5410 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron G1840 in performance tests.

Be aware that Celeron G1840 is a desktop processor while Xeon E5410 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron G1840 and Xeon E5410, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron G1840
Celeron G1840
Intel Xeon E5410
Xeon E5410

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 226 votes

Rate Celeron G1840 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 45 votes

Rate Xeon E5410 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron G1840 or Xeon E5410, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.