Core 2 Extreme QX9775 vs Celeron G1840
Primary details
Comparing Celeron G1840 and Core 2 Extreme QX9775 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | 2333 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 1.35 | no data |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Desktop processor |
| Architecture codename | Haswell (2013−2015) | Yorkfield (2007−2009) |
| Release date | 1 May 2014 (10 years ago) | March 2008 (16 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $53 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Celeron G1840 and Core 2 Extreme QX9775 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 2 | 4 |
| Base clock speed | 2.8 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 2.8 GHz | 3.2 GHz |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 64K (per core) |
| L2 cache | 256 KB (per core) | 12 MB (shared) |
| L3 cache | 3 MB (shared) | 0 KB |
| Chip lithography | 22 nm | 45 nm |
| Die size | 177 mm2 | 2x 107 mm2 |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 72 °C | 63 °C |
| Number of transistors | 1,400 million | 820 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | No | Yes |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron G1840 and Core 2 Extreme QX9775 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | 1150 | 771 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 54 Watt | 150 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron G1840 and Core 2 Extreme QX9775. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron G1840 and Core 2 Extreme QX9775 are enumerated here.
| VT-x | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron G1840 and Core 2 Extreme QX9775. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR2 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 21.3 GB/s | no data |
| ECC memory support | + | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Intel HD (Haswell) | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron G1840 and Core 2 Extreme QX9775.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | no data |
| PCI Express lanes | 16 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 2 | 4 |
| Threads | 2 | 4 |
| Chip lithography | 22 nm | 45 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 54 Watt | 150 Watt |
Celeron G1840 has a 104.5% more advanced lithography process, and 177.8% lower power consumption.
Core 2 Extreme QX9775, on the other hand, has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.
We couldn't decide between Celeron G1840 and Core 2 Extreme QX9775. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron G1840 and Core 2 Extreme QX9775, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
