Celeron G1610T vs G1820

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron G1820
2013
2 cores / 2 threads, 53 Watt
1.10
+25%

G1820 outperforms G1610T by a significant 25% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron G1820 and Celeron G1610T processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking22802429
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.256.67
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Architecture codenameHaswell (2013−2015)Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)
Release date1 December 2013 (10 years ago)3 December 2012 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$110$89
Current price$67 (0.6x MSRP)$10 (0.1x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Celeron G1610T has 196% better value for money than Celeron G1820.

Detailed specifications

Celeron G1820 and Celeron G1610T basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speed2.7 GHz2.3 GHz
Boost clock speed2.7 GHz2.3 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache256 KB (per core)256 KB (per core)
L3 cache2 MB2 MB (shared)
Chip lithography22 nm22 nm
Die size177 mm294 mm2
Maximum core temperature72 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °C65 °C
Number of transistors1,400 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Celeron G1820 and Celeron G1610T compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA1150FCLGA1155
Power consumption (TDP)53 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron G1820 and Celeron G1610T. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2
AES-NI--
AVXno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
My WiFino data-
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology--
TSX-no data
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
SIPP-no data
StatusDiscontinuedDiscontinued

Security technologies

Celeron G1820 and Celeron G1610T technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT--
EDB++
Secure Key+-
Anti-Theftno data-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron G1820 and Celeron G1610T are enumerated here.

VT-d--
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron G1820 and Celeron G1610T. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3
Maximum memory size32 GB32 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth21.3 GB/s21 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® HD Graphics for 4th Generation Intel® ProcessorsIntel® HD Graphics for 3rd Generation Intel® Processors
Max video memory1.7 GBno data
Quick Sync Video+-
Graphics max frequency1.05 GHz1.05 GHz

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron G1820 and Celeron G1610T integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported33
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+no data
HDMI+no data
DVI+no data
VGA+no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Celeron G1820 and Celeron G1610T integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.41920x1080@60Hzno data
Max resolution over eDP2560x1600@60Hzno data
Max resolution over DisplayPort2560x1600@60Hzno data
Max resolution over VGA1920x1200@60Hzno data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron G1820 and Celeron G1610T integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX11.1/12no data
OpenGL4.3no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron G1820 and Celeron G1610T.

PCIe versionUp to 3.02.0
PCI Express lanes16no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron G1820 1.10
+25%
Celeron G1610T 0.88

G1820 outperforms G1610T by 25% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Celeron G1820 1709
+25.8%
Celeron G1610T 1358

G1820 outperforms G1610T by 26% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Celeron G1820 491
+49.2%
Celeron G1610T 329

G1820 outperforms G1610T by 49% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Celeron G1820 825
+41.8%
Celeron G1610T 582

G1820 outperforms G1610T by 42% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.10 0.88
Recency 1 December 2013 3 December 2012
Cost $110 $89
Power consumption (TDP) 53 Watt 35 Watt

The Celeron G1820 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron G1610T in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron G1820 and Celeron G1610T, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron G1820
Celeron G1820
Intel Celeron G1610T
Celeron G1610T

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 158 votes

Rate Celeron G1820 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 8 votes

Rate Celeron G1610T on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron G1820 or Celeron G1610T, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.