Ryzen Threadripper 2950X vs Celeron G1630
Aggregate performance score
Ryzen Threadripper 2950X outperforms Celeron G1630 by a whopping 1627% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 2650 | 419 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 0.08 | 6.81 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Desktop processor |
| Series | no data | AMD Ryzen Threadripper |
| Power efficiency | 0.74 | 3.93 |
| Designer | Intel | AMD |
| Manufacturer | Intel | GlobalFoundries |
| Architecture codename | Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) | ZEN+ (2018−2019) |
| Release date | 1 September 2013 (12 years ago) | 13 August 2018 (7 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $80 | $899 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Ryzen Threadripper 2950X has 8413% better value for money than Celeron G1630.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
Celeron G1630 and Ryzen Threadripper 2950X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 16 (Hexadeca-Core) |
| Threads | 2 | 32 |
| Base clock speed | 2.8 GHz | 3.5 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2.8 GHz | 4.4 GHz |
| Bus rate | 5 GT/s | 4 × 8 GT/s |
| Multiplier | no data | 35 |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 96K (per core) |
| L2 cache | 256 KB (per core) | 512K (per core) |
| L3 cache | 2 MB (shared) | 32 MB |
| Chip lithography | 22 nm | 12 nm |
| Die size | 94 mm2 | 213 mm2 |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 65 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | no data | 19,200 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
| Unlocked multiplier | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron G1630 and Ryzen Threadripper 2950X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 (Uniprocessor) |
| Socket | FCLGA1155 | Socket TR4 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 55 Watt | 180 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron G1630 and Ryzen Threadripper 2950X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2 | no data |
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
| My WiFi | - | no data |
| Turbo Boost Technology | - | no data |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | - | no data |
| Idle States | + | no data |
| Thermal Monitoring | + | - |
| Precision Boost 2 | no data | + |
Security technologies
Celeron G1630 and Ryzen Threadripper 2950X technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | - | no data |
| EDB | + | no data |
| Anti-Theft | - | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron G1630 and Ryzen Threadripper 2950X are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
| VT-d | - | no data |
| VT-x | + | no data |
| EPT | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron G1630 and Ryzen Threadripper 2950X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR4 Quad-channel |
| Maximum memory size | 32 GB | 2 TiB |
| Max memory channels | 2 | 4 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 21 GB/s | 93.867 GB/s |
| ECC memory support | + | + |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Intel HD Graphics for 3rd Generation Intel Processors | - |
| Clear Video HD | - | - |
| Graphics max frequency | 1.05 GHz | - |
| InTru 3D | - | - |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of Celeron G1630 and Ryzen Threadripper 2950X integrated GPUs.
| Number of displays supported | 3 | - |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron G1630 and Ryzen Threadripper 2950X.
| PCIe version | 2.0 | no data |
Synthetic benchmarks
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.
GeekBench 5 Single-Core
GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.97 | 16.75 |
| Recency | 1 September 2013 | 13 August 2018 |
| Physical cores | 2 | 16 |
| Threads | 2 | 32 |
| Chip lithography | 22 nm | 12 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 55 Watt | 180 Watt |
Celeron G1630 has 227.3% lower power consumption.
Ryzen Threadripper 2950X, on the other hand, has a 1626.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, 700% more physical cores and 1500% more threads, and a 83.3% more advanced lithography process.
The AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Celeron G1630 in performance tests.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
