Xeon w7-3555 vs Celeron G1620T

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Celeron G1620T and Xeon w7-3555 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2500not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.40no data
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Power efficiency2.59no data
Architecture codenameIvy Bridge (2012−2013)Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024)
Release date1 September 2013 (11 years ago)24 August 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$42$2,339

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron G1620T and Xeon w7-3555 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)28 (Octacosa-Core)
Threads256
Base clock speed2.4 GHz2.7 GHz
Boost clock speed2.4 GHz4.8 GHz
Bus rate5 GT/sno data
L1 cache64 KB (per core)80 KB (per core)
L2 cache256 KB (per core)2 MB (per core)
L3 cache2 MB (shared)75 MB
Chip lithography22 nmIntel 7 nm
Die size94 mm24x 477 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)65 °C78 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron G1620T and Xeon w7-3555 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA1155FCLGA4677
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt325 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron G1620T and Xeon w7-3555. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® AMX, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI-+
AVX++
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shiftno data+
My WiFi-no data
Turbo Boost Technology-2.0
Hyper-Threading Technology-+
TSX-+
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data+
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Celeron G1620T and Xeon w7-3555 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-+
EDB++
Secure Key-no data
SGXno data-
OS Guardno data+
Anti-Theft-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron G1620T and Xeon w7-3555 are enumerated here.

VT-d-+
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron G1620T and Xeon w7-3555. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR5-4800
Maximum memory size32 GB4 TB
Max memory channels28
Maximum memory bandwidth21 GB/sno data
ECC memory support++

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics for 3rd Generation Intel ProcessorsN/A
Graphics max frequency1.05 GHzno data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron G1620T and Xeon w7-3555 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron G1620T and Xeon w7-3555.

PCIe version2.05.0
PCI Express lanesno data112

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 September 2013 24 August 2024
Physical cores 2 28
Threads 2 56
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 325 Watt

Celeron G1620T has 828.6% lower power consumption.

Xeon w7-3555, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 10 years, and 1300% more physical cores and 2700% more threads.

We couldn't decide between Celeron G1620T and Xeon w7-3555. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that Celeron G1620T is a desktop processor while Xeon w7-3555 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron G1620T and Xeon w7-3555, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron G1620T
Celeron G1620T
Intel Xeon w7-3555
Xeon w7-3555

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 5 votes

Rate Celeron G1620T on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon w7-3555 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron G1620T or Xeon w7-3555, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.