EPYC 9475F vs Celeron G1620

Primary details

Comparing Celeron G1620 and EPYC 9475F processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking	2467	not rated
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	0.03	no data
Market segment	Desktop processor	Server
Power efficiency	1.69	no data
Architecture codename	Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)	Turin (2024)
Release date	3 December 2012 (11 years ago)	10 October 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$208	$7,592

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Detailed specifications

Celeron G1620 and EPYC 9475F basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores	2 (Dual-core)	48 (Octatetraconta-Core)
Threads	2	96
Base clock speed	2.7 GHz	3.65 GHz
Boost clock speed	2.7 GHz	4.8 GHz
Bus rate	5 GT/s	no data
L1 cache	64 KB (per core)	80 KB (per core)
L2 cache	256 KB (per core)	1 MB (per core)
L3 cache	2 MB (shared)	256 MB (shared)
Chip lithography	22 nm	4 nm
Die size	94 mm2	8x 70.6 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)	65 °C	no data
Number of transistors	no data	66,520 million
64 bit support	+	+
Windows 11 compatibility	-	no data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron G1620 and EPYC 9475F compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration	1	2
Socket	FCLGA1155	SP5
Power consumption (TDP)	55 Watt	400 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron G1620 and EPYC 9475F. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions	Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2	no data
AES-NI	-	+
AVX	+	+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)	+	no data
My WiFi	-	no data
Turbo Boost Technology	-	no data
Hyper-Threading Technology	-	no data
Idle States	+	no data
Thermal Monitoring	+	-
Precision Boost 2	no data	+

Security technologies

Celeron G1620 and EPYC 9475F technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT	-	no data
EDB	+	no data
Secure Key	-	no data
Anti-Theft	-	no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron G1620 and EPYC 9475F are enumerated here.

AMD-V	-	+
VT-d	-	no data
VT-x	+	no data
EPT	+	no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron G1620 and EPYC 9475F. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory types	DDR3	DDR5
Maximum memory size	32 GB	no data
Max memory channels	2	no data
Maximum memory bandwidth	21 GB/s	no data
ECC memory support	+	-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card	Intel® HD Graphics for 3rd Generation Intel® Processors	N/A
Graphics max frequency	1.05 GHz	no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron G1620 and EPYC 9475F integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported

3

no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron G1620 and EPYC 9475F.

PCIe version	2.0	5.0
PCI Express lanes	no data	128

Pros & cons summary

---

Recency	3 December 2012	10 October 2024
Physical cores	2	48
Threads	2	96
Chip lithography	22 nm	4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	55 Watt	400 Watt

---

Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron G1620 and EPYC 9475F, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.

---