i5-2467M vs Celeron G1620

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron G1620
2012
2 cores / 2 threads, 55 Watt
1.01
+7.4%

Celeron G1620 outperforms i5-2467M by a small 7% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron G1620 and Core i5-2467M processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking24372494
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.03no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataIntel Core i5
Architecture codenameIvy Bridge (2012−2013)Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
Release date3 December 2012 (11 years ago)1 June 2011 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$208$250

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron G1620 and Core i5-2467M basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads24
Base clock speed2.7 GHz1.6 GHz
Boost clock speed2.7 GHz2.3 GHz
Bus typeno dataDMI 2.0
Bus rate5 GT/s4 × 5 GT/s
Multiplierno data16
L1 cache64 KB (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache256 KB (per core)256K (per core)
L3 cache2 MB (shared)3 MB (shared)
Chip lithography22 nm32 nm
Die size94 mm2149 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)65 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data624 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Celeron G1620 and Core i5-2467M compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCLGA1155FCBGA1023
Power consumption (TDP)55 Watt17 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron G1620 and Core i5-2467M. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2Intel® AVX
AES-NI-+
FMA-+
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
My WiFi-+
Turbo Boost Technology-2.0
Hyper-Threading Technology-+
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Accessno data+
Demand Based Switchingno data-
FDIno data+
Fast Memory Accessno data+
StatusDiscontinuedDiscontinued

Security technologies

Celeron G1620 and Core i5-2467M technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT--
EDB++
Secure Key-no data
Identity Protection-+
Anti-Theft-+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron G1620 and Core i5-2467M are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d--
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron G1620 and Core i5-2467M. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3
Maximum memory size32 GB8.01 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth21 GB/s21.335 GB/s
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® HD Graphics for 3rd Generation Intel® ProcessorsIntel HD Graphics 3000
Quick Sync Video-+
Clear Video HD-+
Graphics max frequency1.05 GHz1.15 GHz
InTru 3D-+

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron G1620 and Core i5-2467M integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported32
eDPno data+
DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+
SDVOno data+
CRTno data+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron G1620 and Core i5-2467M.

PCIe version2.02.0
PCI Express lanesno data16

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron G1620 1.01
+7.4%
i5-2467M 0.94

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron G1620 1560
+8%
i5-2467M 1444

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Celeron G1620 415
+27.7%
i5-2467M 325

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Celeron G1620 720
+15%
i5-2467M 626

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.01 0.94
Recency 3 December 2012 1 June 2011
Threads 2 4
Chip lithography 22 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 55 Watt 17 Watt

Celeron G1620 has a 7.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, and a 45.5% more advanced lithography process.

i5-2467M, on the other hand, has 100% more threads, and 223.5% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Celeron G1620 and Core i5-2467M.

Note that Celeron G1620 is a desktop processor while Core i5-2467M is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron G1620 and Core i5-2467M, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron G1620
Celeron G1620
Intel Core i5-2467M
Core i5-2467M

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 84 votes

Rate Celeron G1620 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 52 votes

Rate Core i5-2467M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron G1620 or Core i5-2467M, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.