Pentium 4 P4 3.0 vs Celeron G1610

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron G1610
2012
2 cores / 2 threads, 55 Watt
0.88
+363%

Celeron G1610 outperforms Pentium 4 P4 3.0 by a whopping 363% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking27563475
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.03no data
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Seriesno dataPentium 4
Power efficiency0.680.09
DesignerIntelIntel
ManufacturerIntelno data
Architecture codenameIvy Bridge (2012−2013)Northwood (2002−2004)
Release date3 December 2012 (12 years ago)no data
Launch price (MSRP)$388no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

Celeron G1610 and Pentium 4 P4 3.0 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads21
Base clock speed2.6 GHzno data
Boost clock speed2.6 GHz3 GHz
Bus rate5 GT/s400 MHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)no data
L2 cache256 KB (per core)no data
L3 cache2 MB (shared)no data
Chip lithography22 nm130 nm
Die size94 mm2no data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)65 °Cno data
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Celeron G1610 and Pentium 4 P4 3.0 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketFCLGA1155no data
Power consumption (TDP)55 Watt89 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron G1610 and Pentium 4 P4 3.0. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2no data
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
My WiFi-no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-

Security technologies

Celeron G1610 and Pentium 4 P4 3.0 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data
Anti-Theft-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron G1610 and Pentium 4 P4 3.0 are enumerated here.

VT-d-no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron G1610 and Pentium 4 P4 3.0. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3no data
Maximum memory size32 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth21 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics for 3rd Generation Intel Processorsno data
Graphics max frequency1.05 GHzno data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron G1610 and Pentium 4 P4 3.0 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron G1610 and Pentium 4 P4 3.0.

PCIe version2.0no data

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.88 0.19
Physical cores 2 1
Threads 2 1
Chip lithography 22 nm 130 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 55 Watt 89 Watt

Celeron G1610 has a 363.2% higher aggregate performance score, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, a 490.9% more advanced lithography process, and 61.8% lower power consumption.

The Intel Celeron G1610 is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Pentium 4 P4 3.0 in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron G1610
Celeron G1610
Intel Pentium 4 P4 3.0
Pentium 4 P4 3.0

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 259 votes

Rate Celeron G1610 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 288 votes

Rate Pentium 4 P4 3.0 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Celeron G1610 and Pentium 4 P4 3.0, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.