Atom N270 vs Celeron G1101
Aggregate performance score
Celeron G1101 outperforms Atom N270 by a whopping 675% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 2972 | 3631 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 0.97 | no data |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
| Series | no data | Intel Atom |
| Power efficiency | 0.36 | 1.35 |
| Designer | Intel | Intel |
| Manufacturer | Intel | no data |
| Architecture codename | Clarkdale (2010−2011) | DiamondVille (2008−2009) |
| Release date | 7 January 2010 (15 years ago) | 2 April 2008 (17 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $85 | $44 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
Celeron G1101 and Atom N270 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 2 | 2 |
| Base clock speed | 2.26 GHz | 1.6 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 0.27 GHz | 0.1 GHz |
| Bus type | no data | FSB |
| Bus rate | no data | 533.33 MT/s |
| Multiplier | no data | 12 |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 56 KB |
| L2 cache | 256 KB (per core) | 512 KB |
| L3 cache | 2 MB (shared) | 0 KB |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 45 nm |
| Die size | 81 mm2 | 25.9638 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 90 °C |
| Number of transistors | 382 million | 47 Million |
| 64 bit support | + | - |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| VID voltage range | no data | 0.9V-1.1625V |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron G1101 and Atom N270 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 (Uniprocessor) |
| Socket | FCLGA1156 | PBGA437 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 73 Watt | 2.5 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron G1101 and Atom N270. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | Intel® SSE, Intel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3 |
| vPro | - | no data |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | - | - |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | - | + |
| Idle States | + | - |
| Thermal Monitoring | - | + |
| Demand Based Switching | - | - |
| PAE | 36 Bit | no data |
| FDI | + | no data |
| FSB parity | no data | - |
Security technologies
Celeron G1101 and Atom N270 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | - | - |
| EDB | + | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron G1101 and Atom N270 are enumerated here.
| VT-d | - | - |
| VT-x | + | - |
| EPT | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron G1101 and Atom N270. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | no data |
| Maximum memory size | 16.38 GB | 8 GB |
| Max memory channels | 2 | no data |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 17 GB/s | no data |
| ECC memory support | + | - |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Intel HD | - |
| Clear Video | - | - |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of Celeron G1101 and Atom N270 integrated GPUs.
| Number of displays supported | 2 | - |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron G1101 and Atom N270.
| PCIe version | 2.0 | no data |
| PCI Express lanes | 1 | no data |
Synthetic benchmarks
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.62 | 0.08 |
| Recency | 7 January 2010 | 2 April 2008 |
| Physical cores | 2 | 1 |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 45 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 73 Watt | 2 Watt |
Celeron G1101 has a 675% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, 100% more physical cores, and a 40.6% more advanced lithography process.
Atom N270, on the other hand, has 3550% lower power consumption.
The Intel Celeron G1101 is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Atom N270 in performance tests.
Note that Celeron G1101 is a desktop processor while Atom N270 is a notebook one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
