Xeon 6788P vs Celeron E3400
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 3128 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 3.72 | no data |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Server |
| Power efficiency | 0.84 | no data |
| Designer | Intel | Intel |
| Manufacturer | Intel | Intel |
| Architecture codename | Wolfdale (2008−2010) | Granite Rapids (2024−2025) |
| Release date | 17 January 2010 (15 years ago) | 24 February 2025 (less than a year ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $76 | $19,000 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
Celeron E3400 and Xeon 6788P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 86 |
| Threads | 2 | 172 |
| Base clock speed | 2.6 GHz | 2 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2.6 GHz | 3.8 GHz |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 112 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 1 MB (shared) | 2 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | 336 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | Intel 3 nm |
| Die size | 82 mm2 | 2x 598 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 74 °C | no data |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 80 °C |
| Number of transistors | 228 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
| VID voltage range | 0.85V-1.3625V | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron E3400 and Xeon 6788P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 8 |
| Socket | LGA775 | FCLGA4710 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 350 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron E3400 and Xeon 6788P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | Intel® AMX, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512 |
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
| Speed Shift | no data | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | - | 2.0 |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | - | + |
| TSX | - | + |
| Idle States | + | no data |
| Thermal Monitoring | + | - |
| Deep Learning Boost | - | + |
Security technologies
Celeron E3400 and Xeon 6788P technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | - | + |
| EDB | + | + |
| SGX | no data | + |
| OS Guard | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron E3400 and Xeon 6788P are enumerated here.
| VT-d | - | + |
| VT-x | + | + |
| EPT | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron E3400 and Xeon 6788P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR1, DDR2, DDR3 | DDR5(6400MT/s) |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 4 TB |
| Max memory channels | no data | 8 |
| ECC memory support | - | + |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | N/A |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron E3400 and Xeon 6788P.
| PCIe version | 2.0 | 5.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 88 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 17 January 2010 | 24 February 2025 |
| Physical cores | 2 | 86 |
| Threads | 2 | 172 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 350 Watt |
Celeron E3400 has 438.5% lower power consumption.
Xeon 6788P, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 15 years, and 4200% more physical cores and 8500% more threads.
We couldn't decide between Intel Celeron E3400 and Intel Xeon 6788P. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that Celeron E3400 is a desktop processor while Xeon 6788P is a server/workstation one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
