GX-215JJ vs Celeron E3400

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking3097not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.72no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Power efficiency0.33no data
DesignerIntelAMD
ManufacturerIntelGlobalFoundries
Architecture codenameWolfdale (2008−2010)Prairie Falcon (2016−2018)
Release date17 January 2010 (15 years ago)23 February 2016 (9 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$76no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

Celeron E3400 and GX-215JJ basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speed2.6 GHz1.5 GHz
Boost clock speed2.6 GHz2 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)160 KB
L2 cache1 MB (shared)1 MB (shared)
L3 cache0 KBno data
Chip lithography45 nm28 nm
Die size82 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature74 °Cno data
Number of transistors228 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
VID voltage range0.85V-1.3625Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron E3400 and GX-215JJ compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketLGA775FP4
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt6 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron E3400 and GX-215JJ. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
FMA-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-

Security technologies

Celeron E3400 and GX-215JJ technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron E3400 and GX-215JJ are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d-no data
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron E3400 and GX-215JJ. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR1, DDR2, DDR3DDR3

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataRadeon R2E 2CU

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron E3400 and GX-215JJ.

PCIe version2.03.0
PCI Express lanesno data8

Pros & cons summary


Recency 17 January 2010 23 February 2016
Chip lithography 45 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 6 Watt

GX-215JJ has an age advantage of 6 years, a 60.7% more advanced lithography process, and 983.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Intel Celeron E3400 and AMD GX-215JJ. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that Celeron E3400 is a desktop processor while GX-215JJ is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron E3400
Celeron E3400
AMD GX-215JJ
GX-215JJ

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 306 votes

Rate Celeron E3400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2 1 vote

Rate GX-215JJ on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Celeron E3400 and GX-215JJ, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.