Xeon Gold 6314U vs Celeron E3200

Aggregate performance score

Celeron E3200
2009
2 cores / 2 threads, 65 Watt
0.53
Xeon Gold 6314U
2021
32 cores / 64 threads, 205 Watt
30.23
+5604%

Xeon Gold 6314U outperforms Celeron E3200 by a whopping 5604% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron E3200 and Xeon Gold 6314U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2853137
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.88no data
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Power efficiency0.7713.96
Architecture codenameWolfdale (2008−2010)Ice Lake-SP (2021)
Release date30 August 2009 (15 years ago)6 April 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$52no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron E3200 and Xeon Gold 6314U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)32 (Dotriaconta-Core)
Threads264
Base clock speed2.4 GHz2.3 GHz
Boost clock speed2.4 GHz3.4 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache1 MB (shared)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB48 MB (shared)
Chip lithography45 nm10 nm
Die size82 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature74 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data81 °C
Number of transistors228 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
VID voltage range0.85V-1.3625Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron E3200 and Xeon Gold 6314U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketLGA775FCLGA4189
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt205 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron E3200 and Xeon Gold 6314U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technology-2.0
Hyper-Threading Technology-+
TSX-+
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Celeron E3200 and Xeon Gold 6314U technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-+
EDB++
SGXno dataYes with Intel® SPS

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron E3200 and Xeon Gold 6314U are enumerated here.

VT-d-+
VT-x++
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron E3200 and Xeon Gold 6314U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR1, DDR2, DDR3DDR4-3200
Maximum memory sizeno data6 TB
Max memory channelsno data8
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron E3200 and Xeon Gold 6314U.

PCIe version2.04.0
PCI Express lanesno data64

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron E3200 0.53
Xeon Gold 6314U 30.23
+5604%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron E3200 839
Xeon Gold 6314U 48013
+5623%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.53 30.23
Recency 30 August 2009 6 April 2021
Physical cores 2 32
Threads 2 64
Chip lithography 45 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 205 Watt

Celeron E3200 has 215.4% lower power consumption.

Xeon Gold 6314U, on the other hand, has a 5603.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 years, 1500% more physical cores and 3100% more threads, and a 350% more advanced lithography process.

The Xeon Gold 6314U is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron E3200 in performance tests.

Note that Celeron E3200 is a desktop processor while Xeon Gold 6314U is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron E3200 and Xeon Gold 6314U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron E3200
Celeron E3200
Intel Xeon Gold 6314U
Xeon Gold 6314U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 76 votes

Rate Celeron E3200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon Gold 6314U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron E3200 or Xeon Gold 6314U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.