Xeon E5-2648L vs Celeron E3200

Aggregate performance score

Celeron E3200
2009
2 cores / 2 threads, 65 Watt
0.55
Xeon E5-2648L
2012
8 cores / 16 threads, 70 Watt
3.44
+525%

Xeon E5-2648L outperforms Celeron E3200 by a whopping 525% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron E3200 and Xeon E5-2648L processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking28491572
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.88no data
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Power efficiency0.774.48
Architecture codenameWolfdale (2008−2010)Sandy Bridge-EP (2012)
Release date30 August 2009 (15 years ago)6 March 2012 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$52no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron E3200 and Xeon E5-2648L basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads216
Base clock speed2.4 GHz1.8 GHz
Boost clock speed2.4 GHz2.3 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache1 MB (shared)256 KB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB20480 KB (shared)
Chip lithography45 nm32 nm
Die size82 mm2435 mm2
Maximum core temperature74 °Cno data
Number of transistors228 million2,270 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage range0.85V-1.3625Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron E3200 and Xeon E5-2648L compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
SocketLGA7752011
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt70 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron E3200 and Xeon E5-2648L. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-+
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-

Security technologies

Celeron E3200 and Xeon E5-2648L technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-+
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron E3200 and Xeon E5-2648L are enumerated here.

VT-d-no data
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron E3200 and Xeon E5-2648L. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR1, DDR2, DDR3DDR3

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron E3200 and Xeon E5-2648L.

PCIe version2.03.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron E3200 0.55
Xeon E5-2648L 3.44
+525%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron E3200 839
Xeon E5-2648L 5262
+527%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.55 3.44
Recency 30 August 2009 6 March 2012
Physical cores 2 8
Threads 2 16
Chip lithography 45 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 70 Watt

Celeron E3200 has 7.7% lower power consumption.

Xeon E5-2648L, on the other hand, has a 525.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, 300% more physical cores and 700% more threads, and a 40.6% more advanced lithography process.

The Xeon E5-2648L is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron E3200 in performance tests.

Note that Celeron E3200 is a desktop processor while Xeon E5-2648L is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron E3200 and Xeon E5-2648L, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron E3200
Celeron E3200
Intel Xeon E5-2648L
Xeon E5-2648L

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 75 votes

Rate Celeron E3200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.8 8 votes

Rate Xeon E5-2648L on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron E3200 or Xeon E5-2648L, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.