Sempron 2650 vs Celeron E3200

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Celeron E3200 and Sempron 2650 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2822not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.88no data
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Architecture codenameWolfdale (2008−2010)Kabini (2013−2014)
Release date30 August 2009 (15 years ago)9 April 2014 (10 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$52no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron E3200 and Sempron 2650 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speed2.4 GHzno data
Boost clock speed2.4 GHz1.45 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)128 KB
L2 cache1 MB (shared)1024 KB
L3 cache0 KBno data
Chip lithography45 nm28 nm
Die size82 mm2107 mm2
Maximum core temperature74 °C90 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data90 °C
Number of transistors228 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
VID voltage range0.85V-1.3625Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron E3200 and Sempron 2650 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketLGA775AM1
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt25 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron E3200 and Sempron 2650. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
FMA-FMA4
AVX-+
PowerNow-+
PowerGating-+
VirusProtect-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
StatusDiscontinuedno data

Security technologies

Celeron E3200 and Sempron 2650 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron E3200 and Sempron 2650 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d-no data
VT-x+no data
IOMMU 2.0-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron E3200 and Sempron 2650. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR1, DDR2, DDR3DDR3-1333
Max memory channelsno data1

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)AMD Radeon R3 Graphics
Number of pipelinesno data128
Enduro-+
Switchable graphics-+
UVD-+
VCE-+

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron E3200 and Sempron 2650 integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron E3200 and Sempron 2650 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno dataDirectX® 12
Vulkan-+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron E3200 and Sempron 2650.

PCIe version2.02.0
PCI Express lanesno data4

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron E3200 839
+52.3%
Sempron 2650 551

Pros & cons summary


Recency 30 August 2009 9 April 2014
Chip lithography 45 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 25 Watt

Sempron 2650 has an age advantage of 4 years, a 60.7% more advanced lithography process, and 160% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Celeron E3200 and Sempron 2650. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron E3200 and Sempron 2650, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron E3200
Celeron E3200
AMD Sempron 2650
Sempron 2650

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 75 votes

Rate Celeron E3200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 16 votes

Rate Sempron 2650 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron E3200 or Sempron 2650, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.