Turion 64 X2 TL-68 vs Celeron E1500

Primary details

Comparing Celeron E1500 and Turion 64 X2 TL-68 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno data2x AMD Turion 64
Architecture codenameAllendale (2006−2009)Tyler (2007−2009)
Release dateNovember 2008 (16 years ago)1 January 2008 (16 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$63no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron E1500 and Turion 64 X2 TL-68 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speed2.2 GHzno data
Boost clock speed2.2 GHz2.4 GHz
Bus rateno data800 MHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)no data
L2 cache512 KB (shared)1 MB
L3 cache0 KBno data
Chip lithography65 nm65 nm
Die size77 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature73 °Cno data
Number of transistors105 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage range0.85V-1.5Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron E1500 and Turion 64 X2 TL-68 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketLGA775no data
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron E1500 and Turion 64 X2 TL-68. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Demand Based Switching-no data
FSB parity-no data

Security technologies

Celeron E1500 and Turion 64 X2 TL-68 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron E1500 and Turion 64 X2 TL-68 are enumerated here.

VT-d-no data
VT-x-no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron E1500 and Turion 64 X2 TL-68. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR1, DDR2, DDR3no data

Pros & cons summary


Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 35 Watt

Turion 64 X2 TL-68 has 85.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Celeron E1500 and Turion 64 X2 TL-68. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that Celeron E1500 is a desktop processor while Turion 64 X2 TL-68 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron E1500 and Turion 64 X2 TL-68, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron E1500
Celeron E1500
AMD Turion 64 X2 TL-68
Turion 64 X2 TL-68

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 48 votes

Rate Celeron E1500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 41 vote

Rate Turion 64 X2 TL-68 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron E1500 or Turion 64 X2 TL-68, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.