EPYC Embedded 3251 vs Celeron E1500
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 3330 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Server |
| Series | no data | AMD EPYC Embedded |
| Power efficiency | 0.23 | no data |
| Designer | Intel | AMD |
| Manufacturer | Intel | no data |
| Architecture codename | Allendale (2006−2009) | Zen (2017−2020) |
| Release date | 30 November 2008 (17 years ago) | 21 February 2018 (7 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $63 | $315 |
Detailed specifications
Celeron E1500 and EPYC Embedded 3251 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 8 (Octa-Core) |
| Threads | 2 | 16 |
| Base clock speed | 2.2 GHz | 2.5 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2.2 GHz | 3.1 GHz |
| Multiplier | no data | 25 |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 96K (per core) |
| L2 cache | 512 KB (shared) | 512K (per core) |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | 16 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 14 nm |
| Die size | 77 mm2 | 192 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 73 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 105 million | 4,800 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | - | + |
| VID voltage range | 0.85V-1.5V | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron E1500 and EPYC Embedded 3251 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 (Uniprocessor) |
| Socket | LGA775 | TR4 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 50 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron E1500 and EPYC Embedded 3251. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
| Turbo Boost Technology | - | no data |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | - | no data |
| Idle States | + | no data |
| Thermal Monitoring | + | - |
| Demand Based Switching | - | no data |
| FSB parity | - | no data |
Security technologies
Celeron E1500 and EPYC Embedded 3251 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | - | no data |
| EDB | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron E1500 and EPYC Embedded 3251 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
| VT-d | - | no data |
| VT-x | - | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron E1500 and EPYC Embedded 3251. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR1, DDR2, DDR3 | DDR4 Eight-channel |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 512 GB |
| Max memory channels | no data | 2 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 42.671 GB/s |
| ECC memory support | - | + |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron E1500 and EPYC Embedded 3251.
| PCIe version | 2.0 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 30 November 2008 | 21 February 2018 |
| Physical cores | 2 | 8 |
| Threads | 2 | 16 |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 14 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 50 Watt |
EPYC Embedded 3251 has an age advantage of 9 years, 300% more physical cores and 700% more threads, a 364.3% more advanced lithography process, and 30% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Intel Celeron E1500 and AMD EPYC Embedded 3251. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that Celeron E1500 is a desktop processor while EPYC Embedded 3251 is a server/workstation one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
