Sempron 150 vs Celeron E1400

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron E1400
2008
2 cores / 2 threads, 65 Watt
0.46
+21.1%
Sempron 150
2010
1 core / 1 thread, 45 Watt
0.38

Celeron E1400 outperforms Sempron 150 by a significant 21% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron E1400 and Sempron 150 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking29353034
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Power efficiency0.670.80
Architecture codenameAllendale (2006−2009)Sargas (2009−2011)
Release dateApril 2008 (16 years ago)7 December 2010 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$57$73

Detailed specifications

Celeron E1400 and Sempron 150 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads21
Base clock speed2 GHz2.9 GHz
Boost clock speed2 GHz2.9 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)128 KB (per core)
L2 cache512 KB (shared)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB0 KB
Chip lithography65 nm45 nm
Die size77 mm2117 mm2
Maximum core temperature73 °Cno data
Number of transistors105 million234 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage range0.85V-1.5Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron E1400 and Sempron 150 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketLGA775AM3
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt45 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron E1400 and Sempron 150. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Demand Based Switching-no data
FSB parity-no data

Security technologies

Celeron E1400 and Sempron 150 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron E1400 and Sempron 150 are enumerated here.

VT-d-no data
VT-x-no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron E1400 and Sempron 150. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR1, DDR2, DDR3DDR3

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron E1400 and Sempron 150.

PCIe versionno data2.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron E1400 0.46
+21.1%
Sempron 150 0.38

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron E1400 735
+23.1%
Sempron 150 597

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.46 0.38
Physical cores 2 1
Threads 2 1
Chip lithography 65 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 45 Watt

Celeron E1400 has a 21.1% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.

Sempron 150, on the other hand, has a 44.4% more advanced lithography process, and 44.4% lower power consumption.

The Celeron E1400 is our recommended choice as it beats the Sempron 150 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron E1400 and Sempron 150, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron E1400
Celeron E1400
AMD Sempron 150
Sempron 150

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.6 63 votes

Rate Celeron E1400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 4 votes

Rate Sempron 150 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron E1400 or Sempron 150, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.