Xeon Platinum 8280M vs Celeron E1200

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron E1200
2008
2 cores / 2 threads, 65 Watt
0.29
Xeon Platinum 8280M
2018
28 cores / 56 threads, 205 Watt
21.43
+7290%

Xeon Platinum 8280M outperforms Celeron E1200 by a whopping 7290% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking3330298
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data0.25
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Seriesno dataIntel Xeon Platinum
Power efficiency0.19no data
DesignerIntelIntel
ManufacturerIntelIntel
Architecture codenameAllendale (2006−2009)Cascade Lake-SP (2018)
Release date20 January 2008 (17 years ago)11 December 2018 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$40$13,012

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

Celeron E1200 and Xeon Platinum 8280M basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)28 (Octacosa-Core)
Threads256
Base clock speed1.6 GHz2.7 GHz
Boost clock speed1.6 GHz4 GHz
Multiplierno data27
L1 cache64 KB (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache512 KB (shared)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB38.5 MB (shared)
Chip lithography65 nm14 nm
Die size77 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature73 °C84 °C
Number of transistors105 million8,000 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
VID voltage range0.85V-1.5Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron E1200 and Xeon Platinum 8280M compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration18 (Multiprocessor)
SocketLGA775FCLGA3647
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt205 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron E1200 and Xeon Platinum 8280M. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® AVX-512
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technology-2.0
Hyper-Threading Technology-+
TSX-+
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Demand Based Switching-no data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data-
FSB parity-no data
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Celeron E1200 and Xeon Platinum 8280M technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-+
EDB++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron E1200 and Xeon Platinum 8280M are enumerated here.

VT-d-+
VT-x-+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron E1200 and Xeon Platinum 8280M. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR1, DDR2, DDR3DDR4-2933
Maximum memory sizeno data2 TB
Max memory channelsno data6
Maximum memory bandwidthno data140.8 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)N/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron E1200 and Xeon Platinum 8280M.

PCIe version2.03.0
PCI Express lanesno data48

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Celeron E1200 0.29
Xeon Platinum 8280M 21.43
+7290%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Celeron E1200 516
Samples: 80
Xeon Platinum 8280M 37665
+7199%
Samples: 1

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.29 21.43
Recency 20 January 2008 11 December 2018
Physical cores 2 28
Threads 2 56
Chip lithography 65 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 205 Watt

Celeron E1200 has 215.4% lower power consumption.

Xeon Platinum 8280M, on the other hand, has a 7289.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, 1300% more physical cores and 2700% more threads, and a 364.3% more advanced lithography process.

The Intel Xeon Platinum 8280M is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Celeron E1200 in performance tests.

Note that Celeron E1200 is a desktop processor while Xeon Platinum 8280M is a server/workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron E1200
Celeron E1200
Intel Xeon Platinum 8280M
Xeon Platinum 8280M

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.6 45 votes

Rate Celeron E1200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.3 4 votes

Rate Xeon Platinum 8280M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Celeron E1200 and Xeon Platinum 8280M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.