Xeon E5-4607 vs Celeron E1200

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron E1200
2008, $40
2 cores / 2 threads, 65 Watt
0.29
Xeon E5-4607
2012
6 cores / 12 threads, 95 Watt
3.96
+1266%

Xeon E5-4607 outperforms Celeron E1200 by a whopping 1266% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking33611571
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Power efficiency0.191.77
DesignerIntelIntel
ManufacturerIntelIntel
Architecture codenameAllendale (2006−2009)Sandy Bridge-EP (2012)
Release date20 January 2008 (17 years ago)14 May 2012 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$40no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron E1200 and Xeon E5-4607 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads212
Base clock speed1.6 GHz2.2 GHz
Boost clock speed1.6 GHz2.2 GHz
Bus rateno data6.4 GT/s
L1 cache64 KB (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache512 KB (shared)256 KB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB15 MB (shared)
Chip lithography65 nm32 nm
Die size77 mm2435 mm2
Maximum core temperature73 °Cno data
Number of transistors105 million2,270 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage range0.85V-1.5Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron E1200 and Xeon E5-4607 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration14
SocketLGA775FCLGA2011
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt95 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron E1200 and Xeon E5-4607. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® AVX
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology-+
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Accessno data-
Demand Based Switching-+
FSB parity-no data

Security technologies

Celeron E1200 and Xeon E5-4607 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-+
EDB++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron E1200 and Xeon E5-4607 are enumerated here.

VT-d-+
VT-x-+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron E1200 and Xeon E5-4607. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR1, DDR2, DDR3DDR3
Maximum memory sizeno data384 GB
Max memory channelsno data4
Maximum memory bandwidthno data34.1 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron E1200 and Xeon E5-4607.

PCIe version2.03.0
PCI Express lanesno data40

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Celeron E1200 0.29
Xeon E5-4607 3.96
+1266%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Celeron E1200 516
Samples: 80
Xeon E5-4607 6986
+1254%
Samples: 1

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.29 3.96
Recency 20 January 2008 14 May 2012
Physical cores 2 6
Threads 2 12
Chip lithography 65 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 95 Watt

Celeron E1200 has 46.2% lower power consumption.

Xeon E5-4607, on the other hand, has a 1265.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, 200% more physical cores and 500% more threads, and a 103.1% more advanced lithography process.

The Intel Xeon E5-4607 is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Celeron E1200 in performance tests.

Note that Celeron E1200 is a desktop processor while Xeon E5-4607 is a server/workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron E1200
Celeron E1200
Intel Xeon E5-4607
Xeon E5-4607

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 54 votes

Rate Celeron E1200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 1 vote

Rate Xeon E5-4607 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Celeron E1200 and Xeon E5-4607, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.