Xeon E-2468 vs Celeron E1200

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron E1200
2008
2 cores / 2 threads, 65 Watt
0.32
Xeon E-2468
2023
8 cores / 16 threads, 65 Watt
16.51
+5059%

Xeon E-2468 outperforms Celeron E1200 by a whopping 5059% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron E1200 and Xeon E-2468 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking3093401
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data93.14
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Power efficiency0.4724.04
Architecture codenameAllendale (2006−2009)Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)
Release dateJanuary 2008 (16 years ago)14 December 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$40$426

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron E1200 and Xeon E-2468 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads216
Base clock speed1.6 GHz2.6 GHz
Boost clock speed1.6 GHz5.2 GHz
Bus rateno data16 GT/s
L1 cache64 KB (per core)80 KB (per core)
L2 cache512 KB (shared)2 MB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB24 MB (shared)
Chip lithography65 nmIntel 7 nm
Die size77 mm2257 mm2
Maximum core temperature73 °C100 °C
Number of transistors105 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
VID voltage range0.85V-1.5Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron E1200 and Xeon E-2468 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketLGA775FCLGA1700
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron E1200 and Xeon E-2468. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology-2
Hyper-Threading Technology-+
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Demand Based Switching-no data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data+
FSB parity-no data

Security technologies

Celeron E1200 and Xeon E-2468 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-+
EDB++
Secure Keyno data+
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron E1200 and Xeon E-2468 are enumerated here.

VT-d-+
VT-x-+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron E1200 and Xeon E-2468. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR1, DDR2, DDR3DDR5-4800
Maximum memory sizeno data128 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron E1200 and Xeon E-2468.

PCIe versionno data5
PCI Express lanesno data16

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron E1200 0.32
Xeon E-2468 16.51
+5059%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron E1200 516
Xeon E-2468 26221
+4982%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.32 16.51
Physical cores 2 8
Threads 2 16

Xeon E-2468 has a 5059.4% higher aggregate performance score, and 300% more physical cores and 700% more threads.

The Xeon E-2468 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron E1200 in performance tests.

Note that Celeron E1200 is a desktop processor while Xeon E-2468 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron E1200 and Xeon E-2468, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron E1200
Celeron E1200
Intel Xeon E-2468
Xeon E-2468

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 40 votes

Rate Celeron E1200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon E-2468 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron E1200 or Xeon E-2468, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.