Ryzen 3 4100 vs Celeron Dual-Core T3500

VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron Dual-Core T3500
2010
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.80
Ryzen 3 4100
2022
4 cores / 8 threads, 65 Watt
6.94
+768%

Ryzen 3 4100 outperforms Celeron Dual-Core T3500 by a whopping 768% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron Dual-Core T3500 and Ryzen 3 4100 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking26151017
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Celeron Dual-Coreno data
Power efficiency2.1610.10
Architecture codenamePenryn (2008−2011)Renoir (2020−2023)
Release date26 September 2010 (14 years ago)4 April 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$80no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron Dual-Core T3500 and Ryzen 3 4100 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads28
Base clock speedno data3.8 GHz
Boost clock speed2.1 GHz4 GHz
Bus rate800 MHzno data
L1 cache128 KB64K (per core)
L2 cache1 MB512K (per core)
L3 cacheno data8.00391 MB (shared)
Chip lithography45 nm7 nm
Die size107 mm2156 mm2
Number of transistors410 Million9,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Celeron Dual-Core T3500 and Ryzen 3 4100 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketSocket P PGA478AM4
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron Dual-Core T3500 and Ryzen 3 4100. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
AVX-+

Security technologies

Celeron Dual-Core T3500 and Ryzen 3 4100 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron Dual-Core T3500 and Ryzen 3 4100 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron Dual-Core T3500 and Ryzen 3 4100. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR4-3200

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron Dual-Core T3500 and Ryzen 3 4100.

PCIe versionno data3.0
PCI Express lanesno data8

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron Dual-Core T3500 0.80
Ryzen 3 4100 6.94
+768%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron Dual-Core T3500 1275
Ryzen 3 4100 11030
+765%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.80 6.94
Recency 26 September 2010 4 April 2022
Physical cores 2 4
Threads 2 8
Chip lithography 45 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 65 Watt

Celeron Dual-Core T3500 has 85.7% lower power consumption.

Ryzen 3 4100, on the other hand, has a 767.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 years, 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 542.9% more advanced lithography process.

The Ryzen 3 4100 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron Dual-Core T3500 in performance tests.

Be aware that Celeron Dual-Core T3500 is a notebook processor while Ryzen 3 4100 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron Dual-Core T3500 and Ryzen 3 4100, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron Dual-Core T3500
Celeron Dual-Core T3500
AMD Ryzen 3 4100
Ryzen 3 4100

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 106 votes

Rate Celeron Dual-Core T3500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 762 votes

Rate Ryzen 3 4100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron Dual-Core T3500 or Ryzen 3 4100, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.