Celeron Dual-Core T1400 vs Dual-Core T3500

Primary details

Comparing Celeron Dual-Core T3500 and Celeron Dual-Core T1400 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2592not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Celeron Dual-CoreIntel Celeron Dual-Core
Power efficiency2.16no data
Architecture codenamePenryn (2008−2011)Merom-2M (2008)
Release date26 September 2010 (14 years ago)1 May 2008 (16 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$80no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron Dual-Core T3500 and Celeron Dual-Core T1400 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Boost clock speed2.1 GHz1.73 GHz
Bus rate800 MHz533 MHz
L1 cache128 KBno data
L2 cache1 MB512 KB
Chip lithography45 nm65 nm
Die size107 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Number of transistors410 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Celeron Dual-Core T3500 and Celeron Dual-Core T1400 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

SocketSocket P PGA478P
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt35 Watt

Security technologies

Celeron Dual-Core T3500 and Celeron Dual-Core T1400 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDB+no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Celeron Dual-Core T3500 4098
+50.4%
Celeron Dual-Core T1400 2725

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Celeron Dual-Core T3500 38.5
+22.1%
Celeron Dual-Core T1400 47

Pros & cons summary


Recency 26 September 2010 1 May 2008
Chip lithography 45 nm 65 nm

Celeron Dual-Core T3500 has an age advantage of 2 years, and a 44.4% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Celeron Dual-Core T3500 and Celeron Dual-Core T1400. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron Dual-Core T3500 and Celeron Dual-Core T1400, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron Dual-Core T3500
Celeron Dual-Core T3500
Intel Celeron Dual-Core T1400
Celeron Dual-Core T1400

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 104 votes

Rate Celeron Dual-Core T3500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 285 votes

Rate Celeron Dual-Core T1400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron Dual-Core T3500 or Celeron Dual-Core T1400, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.