Ryzen 3 5300G vs Celeron Dual-Core T3300

VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron Dual-Core T3300
2010
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.40
Ryzen 3 5300G
2021
4 cores / 8 threads, 65 Watt
8.15
+1938%

Ryzen 3 5300G outperforms Celeron Dual-Core T3300 by a whopping 1938% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron Dual-Core T3300 and Ryzen 3 5300G processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking3006934
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Celeron Dual-CoreAMD Ryzen 3
Power efficiency1.0811.87
Architecture codenamePenryn (2008−2011)Cezanne (2021−2024)
Release date1 February 2010 (14 years ago)13 April 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Celeron Dual-Core T3300 and Ryzen 3 5300G basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads28
Base clock speedno data4 GHz
Boost clock speed2 GHz4.2 GHz
Bus rate800 MHzno data
Multiplierno data40
L1 cache128 KB64K (per core)
L2 cache1 MB512K (per core)
L3 cacheno data8 MB
Chip lithography45 nm7 nm
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data95 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Celeron Dual-Core T3300 and Ryzen 3 5300G compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketSocket P 478AM4
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron Dual-Core T3300 and Ryzen 3 5300G. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
AVX-+

Security technologies

Celeron Dual-Core T3300 and Ryzen 3 5300G technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron Dual-Core T3300 and Ryzen 3 5300G are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron Dual-Core T3300 and Ryzen 3 5300G. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR4-3200
Maximum memory bandwidthno data51.196 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon Vega 6

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron Dual-Core T3300 and Ryzen 3 5300G.

PCIe versionno data4.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron Dual-Core T3300 0.40
Ryzen 3 5300G 8.15
+1938%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron Dual-Core T3300 633
Ryzen 3 5300G 12939
+1944%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.40 8.15
Recency 1 February 2010 13 April 2021
Physical cores 2 4
Threads 2 8
Chip lithography 45 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 65 Watt

Celeron Dual-Core T3300 has 85.7% lower power consumption.

Ryzen 3 5300G, on the other hand, has a 1937.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 years, 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 542.9% more advanced lithography process.

The Ryzen 3 5300G is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron Dual-Core T3300 in performance tests.

Be aware that Celeron Dual-Core T3300 is a notebook processor while Ryzen 3 5300G is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron Dual-Core T3300 and Ryzen 3 5300G, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron Dual-Core T3300
Celeron Dual-Core T3300
AMD Ryzen 3 5300G
Ryzen 3 5300G

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.5 49 votes

Rate Celeron Dual-Core T3300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 123 votes

Rate Ryzen 3 5300G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron Dual-Core T3300 or Ryzen 3 5300G, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.