Athlon X2 QL-67 vs Celeron Dual-Core T3000
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 3149 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | Intel Celeron Dual-Core | 2x AMD Athlon |
| Power efficiency | 1.07 | no data |
| Designer | Intel | AMD |
| Architecture codename | Penryn-1M (2009) | Lion (2008−2009) |
| Release date | 1 May 2009 (15 years ago) | 1 September 2009 (15 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Celeron Dual-Core T3000 and Athlon X2 QL-67 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 2 | 2 |
| Boost clock speed | 1.8 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| Bus rate | 800 MHz | 4000 MHz |
| L1 cache | 64 KB | 256 KB |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 1 MB |
| L3 cache | no data | 0 KB |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 65 nm |
| Die size | 107 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum core temperature | 105 °C | 100 °C |
| Number of transistors | 410 Million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron Dual-Core T3000 and Athlon X2 QL-67 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
| Socket | P (478) | S1g2 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 35 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron Dual-Core T3000 and Athlon X2 QL-67. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, Enhanced 3DNow!, NX bit, AMD64, PowerNow!, AMD Virtualization |
| PowerNow | - | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron Dual-Core T3000 and Athlon X2 QL-67 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 1 May 2009 | 1 September 2009 |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 65 nm |
Celeron Dual-Core T3000 has a 44.4% more advanced lithography process.
Athlon X2 QL-67, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 months.
We couldn't decide between Intel Celeron Dual-Core T3000 and AMD Athlon X2 QL-67. We've got no test results to judge.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
