Celeron G1830 vs Dual-Core T1500

VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron Dual-Core T1500
2008
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.40
Celeron G1830
2013
2 cores / 2 threads, 53 Watt
0.97
+143%

Celeron G1830 outperforms Celeron Dual-Core T1500 by a whopping 143% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron Dual-Core T1500 and Celeron G1830 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking30052488
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data1.23
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Celeron Dual-Coreno data
Power efficiency1.091.71
Architecture codenameMerom (2006−2008)Haswell (2013−2015)
Release date1 May 2008 (16 years ago)1 December 2013 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$85

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron Dual-Core T1500 and Celeron G1830 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speedno data2.8 GHz
Boost clock speed1.87 GHz2.8 GHz
Bus rate533 MHz5 GT/s
L1 cacheno data64 KB (per core)
L2 cache512 KB256 KB (per core)
L3 cacheno data2 MB
Chip lithography65 nm22 nm
Die sizeno data177 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data72 °C
Number of transistorsno data1,400 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Celeron Dual-Core T1500 and Celeron G1830 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
Socketno dataFCLGA1150
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt53 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron Dual-Core T1500 and Celeron G1830. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+

Security technologies

Celeron Dual-Core T1500 and Celeron G1830 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDBno data+
Secure Keyno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron Dual-Core T1500 and Celeron G1830 are enumerated here.

VT-dno data-
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron Dual-Core T1500 and Celeron G1830. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR3
Maximum memory sizeno data32 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data21.3 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel HD Graphics for 4th Generation Intel Processors
Max video memoryno data1.7 GB
Quick Sync Video-+
Graphics max frequencyno data1.05 GHz

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron Dual-Core T1500 and Celeron G1830 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data3
eDPno data+
DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+
DVIno data+
VGAno data+

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Celeron Dual-Core T1500 and Celeron G1830 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.4no data1920x1080@60Hz
Max resolution over eDPno data2560x1600@60Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPortno data2560x1600@60Hz
Max resolution over VGAno data1920x1200@60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron Dual-Core T1500 and Celeron G1830 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno data11.1/12
OpenGLno data4.3

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron Dual-Core T1500 and Celeron G1830.

PCIe versionno dataUp to 3.0
PCI Express lanesno data16

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.40 0.97
Recency 1 May 2008 1 December 2013
Chip lithography 65 nm 22 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 53 Watt

Celeron Dual-Core T1500 has 51.4% lower power consumption.

Celeron G1830, on the other hand, has a 142.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, and a 195.5% more advanced lithography process.

The Celeron G1830 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron Dual-Core T1500 in performance tests.

Be aware that Celeron Dual-Core T1500 is a notebook processor while Celeron G1830 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron Dual-Core T1500 and Celeron G1830, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron Dual-Core T1500
Celeron Dual-Core T1500
Intel Celeron G1830
Celeron G1830

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 7 votes

Rate Celeron Dual-Core T1500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 10 votes

Rate Celeron G1830 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron Dual-Core T1500 or Celeron G1830, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.